Philosophical Studies 85 (2-3):229-249 (1997)
A main epistemic problematic, found already in Aristotle’s Posterior Analytics, presents a threefold choice on how a belief may be justified: either through infinitely regressive reasoning, or through circular reasoning, or through reasoning resting ultimately on some foundation. Aristotle himself apparently takes the foundationalist option when he argues that rational intuition is a foundational source of scientific knowledge. The five modes of Agrippa, which pertain to knowledge generally, again pose the same problematic, the “Pyrrhonian” problematic. And here Galen and the Stoics also opt for foundations. Sections I and II below explore that foundationalist option. Section III draws some lessons. And Section IV uses these to interpret Descartes. I argue that Descartes shows us the way beyond the Pyrrhonian problematic, although his way is not that traditionally attributed to him. On these basic issues of epistemology, Descartes is no Cartesian.
|Keywords||Philosophy Philosophy Epistemology Logic Philosophy of Mind Philosophy of Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Virtue Epistemology and the Acquisition of Knowledge.Duncan Pritchard - 2005 - Philosophical Explorations 8 (3):229 – 243.
Epistemic Commitments, Epistemic Agency and Practical Reasons.Michael Lynch - 2013 - Philosophical Issues 23 (1):343-362.
Similar books and articles
Descartes' Lumen Naturale and the Cartesian Circle.Dale Jacquette - 1996 - Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):273-320.
Reliabilism, Circularity, and the Pyrrhonian Problematic.Markus Lammenranta - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Research 28:311-328.
Resemblance as a Principle of Representation in Descartes' Philosophy.David Scott - 2010 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 84 (3):483-512.
The Pyrrhonian Problematic.Markus Lammenranta - 2008 - In John Greco (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Skepticism. Oxford University Press. pp. 9--33.
Pyrrhonian Reflections on Knowledge and Justification.Robert J. Fogelin - 1994 - Oxford University Press.
The Problem of Secondary Causation in Descartes: A Response to Des Chene.Helen Hattab - 2000 - Perspectives on Science 8 (2):93-118.
Descartes on Divine Providence and Human Freedom.C. P. Ragland - 2005 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 87 (2):159-188.
Cómo resolver la problemática pirrónica: lo que se aprende de Descartes.Ernesto Sosa - 1996 - Teorema: International Journal of Philosophy 16 (1):7-26.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads128 ( #37,519 of 2,169,122 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #126,689 of 2,169,122 )
How can I increase my downloads?