Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (1):175-184 (2010)
Since published acknowledgements of scientific misconduct are a species of image restoration, common strategies for responding publicly to accusations can be expected: from sincere apologies to ritualistic apologies. This study is a rhetorical examination of these strategies as they are reflected in choices in language: it compares the published retractions and letters of apology with the letters that charge misconduct. The letters are examined for any shifts in language between the charge of misconduct and the response to the charge in order to assess whether the apology was sincere or ritualistic. The results indicate that although most authors’ published acknowledgments of scientific misconduct seem to minimize culpability by means of the strategic use of language, their resulting ritualistic apologies often still satisfy in some way the accusers’ (and thus their community’s) concerns.
|Keywords||Rhetoric Apology Research misconduct Ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Taking the Sincerity Out of Saying Sorry: Restorative Justice as Ritual.Christopher Bennett - 2006 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 23 (2):127–143.
The Poehlman Case: Running Away From the Truth. [REVIEW]John E. Dahlberg & Christian C. Mahler - 2006 - Science and Engineering Ethics 12 (1):157-173.
The Effectiveness of the Erratum in Avoiding Error Propagation in Physics.Marshall Thomsen & D. Resnik - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (3):231-240.
Citations of this work BETA
Why Saying "I'm Sorry" Isn't Good Enough.Daryl Koehn - 2013 - Business Ethics Quarterly 23 (2):239-268.
Similar books and articles
Exploring Scientific Misconduct: Isolated Individuals, Impure Institutions, or an Inevitable Idiom of Modern Science? [REVIEW]Benjamin K. Sovacool - 2008 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5 (4):271-282.
Correction and Use of Biomedical Literature Affected by Scientific Misconduct.Anne Victoria Neale, Justin Northrup, Rhonda Dailey, Ellen Marks & Judith Abrams - 2007 - Science and Engineering Ethics 13 (1):5-24.
Official Apologies in the Aftermath of Political Violence.Ernesto Verdeja - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (4):563-581.
Effectiveness of Research Guidelines in Prevention of Scientific Misconduct.Eleanor G. Shore - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (4):383-387.
Scientific Misconduct: Present Problems and Future Trends.Barbara Mishkin - 1999 - Science and Engineering Ethics 5 (2):283-292.
Misconduct in Science and the German Law.Stefanic Stegemann-Bochl - 2000 - Science and Engineering Ethics 6 (1):57-62.
Analysis of Citations to Biomedical Articles Affected by Scientific Misconduct.Anne Victoria Neale, Rhonda K. Dailey & Judith Abrams - 2010 - Science and Engineering Ethics 16 (2):251-261.
Using Criminalization and Due Process to Reduce Scientific Misconduct.Benjamin K. Sovacool - 2005 - American Journal of Bioethics 5 (5):W1-W7.
Added to index2009-07-18
Total downloads25 ( #204,049 of 2,172,041 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,337 of 2,172,041 )
How can I increase my downloads?