Authors
Jacob Sparks
California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo
Abstract
Critics of commodification often claim that the buying and selling of some good communicates disrespect or some other inappropriate attitude. Such semiotic critiques have been leveled against markets in sex, pornography, kidneys, surrogacy, blood, and many other things. Brennan and Jaworski (2015a) have recently argued that all such objections fail. They claim that the meaning of a market transaction is a highly contingent, socially constructed fact. If allowing a market for one of these goods can improve the supply, access or quality of the good, then instead of banning the market on semiotic grounds, they urge that we should revise our semiotics. In this reply, I isolate a part of the meaning of a market transaction that is not socially constructed: our market exchanges always express preferences. I then show how cogent semiotic critiques of some markets can be constructed on the basis of this fact.
Keywords commodification  markets  semiotics  business ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1053-8364
DOI 10.5840/jpr2017425101
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Ethics of Voting.Jason Brennan - 2011 - Princeton Univ Pr.
On Ethics and Economics.Amartya Sen - 1989 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 51 (4):722-723.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Markets Within the Limit of Feasibility.Kenneth Silver - forthcoming - Journal of Business Ethics:1-15.
The Meaning of a Market and the Meaning of "Meaning".Julian D. Jonker - 2019 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 15 (2).
Semiotic Limits to Markets Defended.David Rondel - 2022 - Philosophia 50 (1):217-232.
Come On, Come On, Love Me for the Money.Jason Brennan & Peter M. Jaworski - 2018 - Business Ethics Journal Review 6 (6):30-35.
Can’T Buy Approval.Jacob Sparks - 2018 - Business Ethics Journal Review 6 (2):7-10.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Expressive Objections to Markets: Normative, Not Symbolic.Daniel Layman - 2016 - Business Ethics Journal Review 4 (1):1-6.
Conservation Through Commodification?Jozef Keulartz - 2013 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 16 (3):297-307.
What Limits Should Markets Be Without?James Stacey Taylor - 2016 - Business Ethics Journal Review 4 (7):41-46.
Why Markets in Proto-Deceptive Goods Should Be Restricted.James Stacey Taylor - 2006 - Journal of Business Ethics 65 (4):325-335.
Habermas and Markets.Timo Jütten - 2013 - Constellations 20 (4):587-603.
Transformable Goods and the Limits of What Money Can Buy.David G. Dick - 2017 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 4 (1):121-140.
Black Markets, Transplant Kidneys and Interpersonal Coercion.J. S. Taylor - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (12):698-701.
Business Ethics in a Competitive Market.Julianne Nelson - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (9):663 - 666.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-04-27

Total views
540 ( #15,652 of 2,498,242 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
71 ( #10,916 of 2,498,242 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes