Cloning, parenthood, and genetic relatedness

Bioethics 20 (6):308–318 (2006)

Authors
Robert Sparrow
Monash University
Abstract
In this paper I examine what I take to be the best case for reproductive human cloning, as a medical procedure designed to overcome infertility, and argue that it founders on an irresolvable tension in the attitude towards the importance of being ‘genetically related’ to our children implied in the desire to clone. Except in the case where couples are cloning a child they have previously conceived naturally, cloning is unable to establish the right sort of genetic relation to make couples the parents of their cloned child. If anybody is the genetic parent of a cloned child it is the natural parent(s) of the DNA donor. Paradoxically, in order to resist the claims of the parents of the donor to the cloned child, the argument for human reproductive cloning must place more weight on the intention to parent a child, than we do in cases of ordinary reproduction. It must insist that the parental relation is established by the intentions of the couple who bring a clone into the world and not by their genetic relation to the child. The emphasis placed on intention as establishing the parental relationship works to undermine the justification for cloning in the first place. For cloning to play a useful role as a reproductive technology, it must allow couples to become parents who could do so no other way. However, to the extent that intention is sufficient to establish parenthood, adoption or surrogacy, which are existing alternatives to cloning, will serve equally well to allow couples to become parents.
Keywords genetic relatedness  children  cloning  parenthood  genes  ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2006.00509.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,662
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

"Are You My Mommy?" On the Genetic Basis of Parenthood.Avery Kolers & Tim Bayne - 2001 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 18 (3):273–285.
The Question of Human Cloning.John A. Robertson - 1994 - Hastings Center Report 24 (2):6-14.
Cloning and Genetic Parenthood.Avery Kolers - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (4):401-410.
Send in the Clones ... Don't Bother, They 'Re Here'.B. Rollin - 1997 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 10 (1):25-40.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why is an Egg Donor a Genetic Parent, but Not a Mitochondrial Donor?Monika Piotrowska - 2019 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28 (3):488-498.
Biological Ties and Biological Accounts of Moral Status.Jake Monaghan - 2019 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 44 (3):355-377.
Is ‘Assisted Reproduction’ Reproduction?Monika Piotrowska - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (270):138-157.
Therapeutic Cloning and Reproductive Liberty.Robert Sparrow - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (2):1-17.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Identity of Clones.Kathinka Evers - 1999 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (1):67 – 76.
Therapeutic Cloning and Reproductive Liberty.Robert Sparrow - 2008 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (2):1-17.
New Dog: Old Tricks.Mark Greene - 2002 - Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 5 (3):239-242.
Telomeres and the Ethics of Human Cloning.Fritz Allhoff - 2004 - American Journal of Bioethics 4 (2):29 – 31.
Cloning and Genetic Parenthood.Avery Kolers - 2003 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 12 (4):401-410.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
47 ( #186,405 of 2,280,725 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #411,028 of 2,280,725 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature