Synonymy and equivocation in ockham's mental language

Authors
Paul Vincent Spade
Indiana University, Bloomington
Abstract
A textual and philosophical study of the claim that according to ockham there is no synonymy or equivocation in mental language. It is argued that ockham is committed to both claims, Either explicitly or in virtue of other features of his doctrine. Nevertheless, Both claims lead to difficulties for ockham's theory
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/hph.2008.0355
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 33,225
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Roles of Philosophy in Cognitive Science.Tim van Gelder - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (2):117-36.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
49 ( #123,392 of 2,242,774 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #112,194 of 2,242,774 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature