A tale of two simples

Philosophical Studies 148 (2):167 - 181 (2010)
A material simple is a material object that has no proper parts. Some philosophers have argued for the possibility of extended simples. Some have even argued for the possibility of heterogeneous simples or simples that have intrinsic variations across their surfaces. There is a puzzle, though, that is meant to show that extended, heterogeneous simples are impossible. Although several plausible responses have been given to this puzzle, I wish to reopen the case against extended, heterogeneous simples. In this paper, I briefly canvass responses to this puzzle which may be made in defense of extended, heterogeneous simples. I then present a new version of this puzzle which targets simples that occupy atomic yet extended regions of space. It seems that none of the traditional responses can be used to successfully save this particular kind of extended simple from the new puzzle. I also consider some non-traditional defenses of heterogeneous extended simples and argue that they too are unsuccessful. Finally, I will argue that a substantial case can be made against the possibility of extended heterogeneous simples of any kind.
Keywords Simples  Material Objects  Space  Tile Space  Spatial Intrinsics  Continuity
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history Request removal from index
Download options
PhilPapers Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 24,422
External links
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Ned Markosian (1998). Simples. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 76 (2):213 – 228.

View all 9 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
A. J. Cotnoir (2013). Parts as Counterparts. Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (3):228-241.
Martin Pickup (2016). The Trinity and Extended Simples. Faith and Philosophy 33 (4):414-440.
Andrew J. Jaeger (2014). A Tale of Two Parts. Res Philosophica 91 (3):477-484.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Mark Scala (2002). Homogeneous Simples. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 64 (2):393 - 397.
Josh Parsons (2008). Hudson on Location. [REVIEW] Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 76 (2):427 - 435.
Neal A. Tognazzini (2006). Simples and the Possibility of Discrete Space. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 84 (1):117 – 128.
Michael V. Antony (2001). Conceiving Simple Experiences. Journal of Mind and Behavior 22 (3):263-86.
Kris McDaniel (2003). Against Maxcon Simples. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):265 – 275.
Kris McDaniel (2007). Extended Simples. Philosophical Studies 133 (1):131 - 141.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

166 ( #25,330 of 1,924,768 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #211,945 of 1,924,768 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

Start a new thread
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.