Functions in Basic Formal Ontology

Applied Ontology 11 (2):103-128 (2016)
Authors
Barry Smith
State University of New York, Buffalo
Andrew Spear
Grand Valley State University
Abstract
The notion of function is indispensable to our understanding of distinctions such as that between being broken and being in working order (for artifacts) and between being diseased and being healthy (for organisms). A clear account of the ontology of functions and functioning is thus an important desideratum for any top-level ontology intended for application to domains such as engineering or medicine. The benefit of using top-level ontologies in applied ontology can only be realized when each of the categories identified and defined by a top-level ontology is integrated with the others in a coherent fashion. Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) has from the beginning included function as one of its categories, exploiting a version of the etiological account of function that is framed at a level of generality sufficient to accommodate both biological and artifactual functions. This account has been subjected to a series of criticisms and refinements. We here articulate BFO’s account of function, provide some reasons for favoring it over competing views, and defend it against objections.
Keywords Ruth Millikan  etiology  Basic Formal Ontology
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3233/AO-160164
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Finkish Dispositions.David Lewis - 1997 - Philosophical Quarterly 47 (187):143-158.
Functional Analysis.Robert Cummins - 1975 - Journal of Philosophy 72 (November):741-64.
An Organizational Account of Biological Functions.Matteo Mossio, Cristian Saborido & Alvaro Moreno - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):813-841.
Dispositions and Habituals.Michael Fara - 2005 - Noûs 39 (1):43–82.
Dispositional Essentialism.Brian Ellis & Caroline Lierse - 1994 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 72 (1):27 – 45.

View all 13 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Function, Role and Disposition in Basic Formal Ontology.Robert Arp & Barry Smith - 2008 - Proceedings of Bio-Ontologies Workshop, Intelligent Systems for Molecular Biology (ISMB), Toronto.
Basic Concepts of Formal Ontology.Barry Smith - 1998 - In Nicola Guarino (ed.), Formal Ontology in Information Systems. IOS Press. pp. 19-28.
Some Formal Ontological Relations.E. J. Lowe - 2004 - Dialectica 58 (3):297–316.
SNAP and SPAN: Towards Dynamic Spatial Ontology.Pierre Grenon & Barry Smith - 2004 - Spatial Cognition and Computation 4 (1):69–103.
Biodynamic Ontology: Applying BFO in the Biomedical Domain.Barry Smith, Pierre Grenon & Louis Goldberg - 2004 - Studies in Health and Technology Informatics 102:20–38.
Is Formal Logic a Kind of Ontology?Ryszard Maciołek - 2008 - Roczniki Filozoficzne 56 (1):191-219.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-05-27

Total downloads
240 ( #21,483 of 2,308,619 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
28 ( #16,257 of 2,308,619 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature