Factive presuppositions, accommodation and information structure

Abstract
There are three ways to refer to a fact from the complement of afactive verb: (1) Via abstract object anaphoric reference, or, witha full sentential complement that will be interpreted either (2) asa bound presupposition or (3) as triggering a presupposition of afact that will have to be accommodated. Spoken corpus examplesreveal that these three possibilities differ in relation to thetype of information they tend to contribute, and this has twoeffects. First, the information status of the fact and its role inthe discourse seem to affect the preference for one constructionover another in a particular context. Second, presupposed factivecomplements that need to be accommodated tend to be hearer-new andthe focus of the utterance, meaning that information structureseems to contribute to the felicity of accommodation ofpresupposed facts.
Keywords accommodation  anaphors  factives  focus  information structure  presuppositions
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1024191513816
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,841
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Factive and Nonfactive Mental State Attribution.Jennifer Nagel - 2017 - Mind and Language 32 (5):525-544.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
21 ( #259,577 of 2,210,292 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #165,188 of 2,210,292 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature