Necessity of origins and multi-origin art

Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 62 (7):741-754 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTThe Necessity of Origins is the thesis that, necessarily, if a material object wholly originates from some particular material, then it could not have wholly originated from any significantly non-overlapping material. Several philosophers have argued for this thesis using as a premise a principle that we call ‘Single Origin Necessity’. However, we argue that Single Origin Necessity is false. So any arguments for The Necessity of Origins that rely on Single Origin Necessity are unsound. We also argue that the Necessity of Origins itself is false. Our arguments rely on a thesis in the ontology of art that we find plausible: Multi-Work Materialism. It is the thesis that works of art that have multiple concrete manifestations are co-located with those manifestations.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-05-09

Downloads
651 (#36,409)

6 months
107 (#51,997)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Joshua Spencer
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee
Chris Tillman
University of Manitoba

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 1980 - Philosophy 56 (217):431-433.
Naming and Necessity.S. Kripke - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 45 (4):665-666.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 2003 - In John Heil (ed.), Philosophy of Mind: A Guide and Anthology. New York: Oxford University Press.
The metaphysics of modality.Graeme Forbes - 1985 - Oxford: Clarendon Press.

View all 31 references / Add more references