Journal of French and Francophone Philosophy 23 (2):98-121 (2015)
AbstractIn the late 1970s and the 1980s, a number of radical left political theorists focused their philosophical attention on the relevance of ancient atomism, revitalizing a tradition that went back to Karl Marx's work on his dissertation. This essay looks at the uses of atomism by two thinkers in particular, Jacques Rancière and Alain Badiou, in order to see how their discussions of and references to ancient materialism help to shed light on their fundamental disagreements about the nature of community and equality. First, this paper argues that what Badiou and Rancière most obviously share in their assessments of atomism is a negative judgment regarding the post-swerve constitution of the world, while what most obviously distinguishes their positions is their differing judgments regarding the preswerve rain of the atoms in the void. Becoming clear both about how Badiou and Rancière respond to what comes before and after the atomistic swerve helps to clarify an implicit response on Rancière’s part to what has become Badiou’s chief objection to Rancière’s political theory. Second, this paper argues that the fact that Badiou assesses both what comes before and what comes after the swerve as negative, while Rancière assesses only what comes after the swerve as negative, makes clear that their most essential point of difference concerns the status of the swerve that mediates between before and after. Working through the complexities of Badiou’s analysis of the swerve and uncovering Rancière’s extremely subtle analysis of the swerve helps to clarify a major aspect of what has become Rancière’s chief criticism of Badiou’s conception of philosophy.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
In-Depth Time Compaction in Fundamental Measurement of Consciousness by HusserlHeidegger-Badiou.Viktor Okorokov - 2020 - Filosofiâ I Kosmologiâ 25:118-129.
Similar books and articles
Inaesthetics and Truth: The Debate Between Alain Badiou and Jacques Rancière.Devin Zane Shaw - 2004 - Filozofski Vestnik 25 (2).
Art, Politics and Philosophy.John W. P. Phillips - 2010 - Theory, Culture and Society 27 (4):146-160.
The Lessons of Jacques Rancière : Knowledge and Power After the Storm.Alain Badiou - 2009 - In Gabriel Rockhill & Philip Watts (eds.), Jacques Rancière: History, Politics, Aesthetics. Duke University Press.
Badiou, Balibar, Rancière: Re-Thinking Emancipation; The Political Thought of Jacques Rancière: Creating Equality. [REVIEW]Pablo Lafuente - 2008 - Radical Philosophy 152.
Thinking the Break: Rancière, Badiou and the Return of a Politics of Resistance.Todd May - 2009 - Comparative and Continental Philosophy 1 (2):253-268.
Introductions to Christian Jambet, Guy Lardreau, Jacques Rancière, Alain Badiou, Monique David-Menard, Daniel Bensaïd.Peter Hallward - 2003 - Angelaki 8 (2).
Book Review: Alain Badiou: Key Concepts, Jacques Rancière: Key Concepts. [REVIEW]John Lechte - 2014 - Thesis Eleven 122 (1):116-119.
Interviews with Alain Badiou, Philippe Lacoue-Labarthe, Jean-Luc Nancy, Jacques Rancière, Michel Serres, and Bernard Stiegler.Peter Hallward - 2003 - Angelaki 8 (2).
The Omnipresence Of The Political. An Attempt At The Introduction To Jacques Rancière’s Philosophy Of The Image.Łukasz Andrzejewski - 2013 - Studia Philosophica Wratislaviensia 8 (2):129-147.
Imposed Subservience: A Cautionary Note on Misuses of Jacques Rancière's Taxonomy of Art.Steven Fleming - unknown
Badiou Versus Derrida: Truth, Sets, and Sophistry.David Fiorovanti - 2012 - Philosophical Forum 43 (1):51-64.
Demanding Approval: On the Ethics of Alain Badiou.Simon Critchley - 2000 - Radical Philosophy 100:16-27.