Authors
Jack Spencer
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords newcomb's problem  causal decision theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

What Do Philosophers Believe?David Bourget & David J. Chalmers - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 170 (3):465-500.
The Toxin Puzzle.Gregory S. Kavka - 1983 - Analysis 43 (1):33-36.
Why Take Both Boxes?Jack Spencer & Ian Wells - 2019 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 99 (1):27-48.
Some Counterexamples to Causal Decision Theory.Andy Egan - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (1):93-114.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Newcomb's Problem.Arif Ahmed (ed.) - 2018 - Cambridge University Press.
Push the Button.Arif Ahmed - 2012 - Philosophy of Science 79 (3):386-395.
Infallibility in the Newcomb Problem.Arif Ahmed - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (2):261-273.
Success-First Decision Theories.Preston Greene - 2018 - In Arif Ahmed (ed.), Newcomb's Problem. Cambridge University Press. pp. 115–137.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-11-05

Total views
141 ( #84,145 of 2,520,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
14 ( #55,606 of 2,520,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes