- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Relevance theory explains the selection task
Cognition 57 (1):31-95 (1995)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)Author's Profile
Other Versions
No versions found
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Information gain explains relevance which explains the selection task.M. Oaksford - 1995 - Cognition 57 (1):97-108.
Does reasoning occur on the selection task? A comparison of relevance-based theories.David Hardman - 1998 - Thinking and Reasoning 4 (4):353 – 376.
Inept reasoners or pragmatic virtuosos? Relevance and the deontic selection task.Vittorio Girotto, Markus Kemmelmeier, Dan Sperber & Jean-Baptiste van der Henst - 2001 - Cognition 81 (2):B69-B76.
Causal cognition-A multidisciplinary debate-Sperber, D, Premack, D, Premack, AJ.J. Tanney - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1).
Dan Sperber and Deirdre Wilson, Relevance: Communication and Cognition.F. Murphy - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5:144-144.
Natural selection for the selection task: limits to social exchange theory.Paul Pollard - 1990 - Cognition 36 (2):195-204.
The principle of relevance in the light of cooperation and trust: Discussing Sperber and Wilsons theory.Cristián Santibañez - 2012 - Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (3):483-504.
Guidelines and criticisms of the relevance theory of Sperber and Wilson', 'Lineamientos y críticas a la teoría de la relevancia de Sperber y Wilson.Nancy Núñez - unknown
Context selection and the frame problem.D. L. Chiappe & A. Kukla - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):529-530.
Analytics
Added to PP
2014-01-20
Downloads
68 (#330,104)
6 months
8 (#482,871)
2014-01-20
Downloads
68 (#330,104)
6 months
8 (#482,871)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Why do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory.Dan Sperber - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (2):57.
Human reasoning and cognitive science.Keith Stenning & Michiel van Lambalgen - 2008 - Boston, USA: MIT Press.
Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality.Gerd Gigerenzer & Daniel Goldstein - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (4):650-669.
Modularity in cognition: Framing the debate.H. Clark Barrett & Robert Kurzban - 2006 - Psychological Review 113 (3):628-647.
References found in this work
Relevance: Communication and Cognition.Dan Sperber & Deirdre Wilson - 1986/1995 - Oxford: Blackwell.
Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts.Kent Bach & Robert M. Harnish - 1979 - Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.K. Popper - 1959 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 10 (37):55-57.
Aspects of scientific explanation.Carl G. Hempel - 1965 - In Carl Gustav Hempel, Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science. New York: The Free Press. pp. 504.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-99fc7d78b-qtxsx uwo