Reviving Ulysses contracts

Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 13 (4):373-392 (2003)
: Ulysses contracts have faced paternalism objections since they first were proposed. Since the contracts are designed to override a present request from a legally competent patient in favor of a past request made by that patient, enforcement of these contracts was argued to be unjustifiable strong paternalism. Recent legal developments and new theories of practical reasoning suggest that the discussion of Ulysses contracts should be revived. This paper argues that with a proper understanding of the future-directed planning embodied in Ulysses contracts, the charge of strong paternalism can be answered, and the enforcement of some Ulysses contracts may be justified under the rubric of weak paternalism
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.2004.0010
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,133
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Nudge Ethics: Just a Game of Billiards?Caroline J. Huang & Matthew L. Baum - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (2):22-24.
Psychiatric Outpatient Commitment: One Tool Along a Continuum.Ryan Spellecy - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (11):45 – 47.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Business Ethics and Extant Social Contracts.Thomas W. Dunfee - 1991 - Business Ethics Quarterly 1 (1):23-51.
Lest We Forget.L. Kidder Deborah, P. Smith William & E. Litzky Barrie - 2009 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 20:357-363.
Ulysses Contracts and the Nocebo Effect.Y. M. Barilan - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (3):37-39.
Ulysses Contracts.Michael Lavin - 1986 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 3 (1):89-101.
How to Justify Enforcing a Ulysses Contract When Ulysses is Competent to Refuse.John K. Davis - 2008 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 18 (1):pp. 87-106.
Precedent Autonomy and Personal Identity.Michael Quante - 1999 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 9 (4):365-381.
Ulysses Contracts in Medicine.Tom Walker - 2012 - Law and Philosophy 31 (1):77-98.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
32 ( #164,642 of 2,191,816 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,783 of 2,191,816 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature