Should Architects Refrain From Designing Prisons for Long-term Solitary Confinement? – An Open Letter to the Architecture Profession

Architecture Philosophy 4 (1) (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In a profile in the November, 2012 issue of the magazine Architect, activist-architect Raphael Sperry, a founder of the group Architects Planners & Designers for Social Responsibility discussed his petition to amend the AIA’s Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct to include a prohibition on “the design of spaces intended for long-term solitary isolation and execution.”1 This issue is both serious and timely. It deserves contemplative attention before any action is taken. The purpose of this letter is to provide the the architecture profession a condensed analysis of the possible justification for taking the action Mr. Sperry advocates. After review and consideration, we are persuaded that Mr. Sperry’s proposal does merit action by the AIA.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Role and Status Dilemas of Architects in Postsocialist City.Dalia Čiupailaitė - 2014 - Santalka: Filosofija, Komunikacija 22 (1):15-37.
Is engineering a profession everywhere?Michael Davis - 2009 - Philosophia 37 (2):211-225.
Irigaray for architects.Peg Rawes - 2007 - New York: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-13

Downloads
17 (#846,424)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Spector
Oklahoma State University

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references