The relation of response latency and speed to the intervening variables and N in S-R theory

Psychological Review 61 (4):209-216 (1954)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1037/h0058746
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,686
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Black Box Inference: When Should Intervening Variables Be Postulated?Elliott Sober - 1998 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 49 (3):469-498.
Forward, Backward, and Pseudoconditioning of the GSR.R. A. Champion & J. E. Jones - 1961 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 62 (1):58.
Response Latency as a Function of the Amount of Reinforcement.David Zeaman - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (4):466.
Order of Presentation, Cs Intensity, and Response Latency.G. Robert Grice, John J. Hunter & David L. Kohfeld - 1967 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 74 (4, Pt.1):581-585.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-06-30

Total views
5 ( #986,061 of 2,243,063 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #1,042,900 of 2,243,063 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature