William James Studies 16 (1):01-25 (2020)

Authors
Jake Spinella
University of Illinois, Chicago
Abstract
I argue, contra traditional interpretations of James's emotion theory like Antonio Damasio and alternative interpretations like Phoebe Ellsworth and Lisa Barrett, that James is best classified as a functionalist regarding emotion categories. In arguing for this point, I will make four textual claims: (1) James was an important precursor to Basic Emotion Theory (BET) and his theory is best identified as a flavor of BET; (2) James's theory individuates emotion categories by their evolutionary, functional roles; (3) The only necessary condition on something being an emotion is that it is a bodily feeling; and, (4) Contrary to Barrett and Ellsworth, James was loath to offer a definitive list of basic emotions not because he loathed taxonomy but rather because he thought psychology was not yet a natural science with well-defined theoretical categories. I close by arguing that a proper understanding of James's emotion theory defangs some critiques of BET and of Neo-Jamesian theory.
Keywords emotion  philosophy of psychology  American Pragmatism  William James
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Physical Basis of Emotion.William James - 1994 - Psychological Review 101 (2):205-210.
The Feeling of Effort.W. James - 1880 - Mind 5:582.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

William James' Theory of Emotions: Filling in the Picture.J. M. Barbalet - 1999 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 29 (3):251–266.
William James and the Psychology of Emotions: From 1884 to the Present.Joseph T. Palencik - 2007 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 43 (4):769 - 786.
William James on Emotion and Intentionality.Matthew Ratcliffe - 2005 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 13 (2):179-202.
Consolation - An Unrecognized Emotion.Weber-Guskar Eva - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (3):171--191.
Hypothesis, Faith, and Commitment: William James' Critique of Science.Jack Barbalet - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (3):213–230.
Lange Vs James on Emotion, Passion, and the Arts.Paisley Livingston - 2019 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 85:39-56.
Against Basic Emotions, and Toward a Comprehensive Theory.Marc A. Cohen - 2005 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 26 (4):229-254.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-10

Total views
262 ( #37,469 of 2,455,578 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
20 ( #35,521 of 2,455,578 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes