A refutation of the Neyman-Pearson theory of testing

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):201-222 (1973)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/24.3.201

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The Neyman-Pearson theory as decision theory, and as inference theory; with a criticism of the Lindley-Savage argument for bayesian theory.Allan Birnbaum - 1977 - Synthese 36 (1):19 - 49.
On the Neyman–Pearson Theory of Testing.Spencer Graves - 1978 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 29 (1):1-23.
Of Nulls and Norms.Peter Godfrey-Smith - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:280 - 290.
The logic of tests of significance.Stephen Spielman - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (3):211-226.
A new paradigm for hypothesis testing in medicine, with examination of the Neyman Pearson condition.G. William Moore, Grover M. Hutchins & Robert E. Miller - 1986 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 7 (3).
Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and neyman–pearson.Johannes Lenhard - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):69-91.
Did Pearson reject the Neyman-Pearson philosophy of statistics?Deborah G. Mayo - 1992 - Synthese 90 (2):233 - 262.
Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.
The ego has landed! The .05 level of statistical significance is soft (fisher) rather than hard (neyman/pearson).Lester E. Krueger - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (2):207-208.
Mathematical statistics and metastatistical analysis.Andrés Rivadulla - 1991 - Erkenntnis 34 (2):211 - 236.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
77 (#211,518)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Spielman
University of Pennsylvania (PhD)

Citations of this work

Severe testing as a basic concept in a neyman–pearson philosophy of induction.Deborah G. Mayo & Aris Spanos - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (2):323-357.
The logic of tests of significance.Stephen Spielman - 1974 - Philosophy of Science 41 (3):211-226.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Logic of Statistical Inference.Ian Hacking - 1965 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
A falsifying rule for probability statements.Donald A. Gillies - 1971 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 22 (3):231-261.

Add more references