Erkenntnis 85 (1):99-119 (2020)

Authors
Abstract
Open futurism is the indeterministic position according to which the future is ‘open’, i.e., there is now no fact of the matter as to what future contingent events will actually obtain. Many open futurists hold a branching conception of time, in which a variety of possible futures exist. This paper introduces two challenges to branching-time open futurism, which are similar in spirit to a challenge posed by Fine to tense realism. The paper argues that, to address the new challenges, open futurists must adopt an objective, non-perspectival notion of actuality and subscribe to an A-theoretic, dynamic conception of reality. Moreover, given a natural understanding of “actual future”, it is perfectly sensible for open futurists to hold that a unique, objectively actual future exists, contrary to a common assumption in the current debate. The paper also contends that recognising the existence of a unique actual future helps open futurists to avoid potential misconceptions.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10670-018-0020-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Demonstratives: An Essay on the Semantics, Logic, Metaphysics and Epistemology of Demonstratives and Other Indexicals.David Kaplan - 1989 - In Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard Wettstein (eds.), Themes From Kaplan. Oxford University Press. pp. 481-563.
The Question of Realism.Kit Fine - 2001 - Philosophers' Imprint 1:1-30.
Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers.Kit Fine - 2005 - Oxford University Press.
Future Contingents and Relative Truth.John MacFarlane - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (212):321–336.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Knowledge of Future Contingents.Andrea Iacona - forthcoming - Philosophical Studies.
The Invisible Thin Red Line.Giuliano Torrengo & Samuele Iaquinto - 2020 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 101 (3):354-382.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Future Contingents, Freedom, and Foreknowledge.Mohammed Abouzahr - 2013 - Dissertation, Wayne State University
Open Future and Modal Anti-Realism.Daniel Kodaj - 2014 - Philosophical Studies 168 (2):1-22.
The Foundation of the Child's Right to an Open Future.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Journal of Social Philosophy 45 (4):522-538.
Generic Open Theism and Some Varieties Thereof.Alan R. Rhoda - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (2):225-234.
Past, Present, Future, and Special Relativity.Nataša Rakić - 1997 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 48 (2):257-280.
The Philosophical Case for Open Theism.Alan Rhoda - 2007 - Philosophia 35 (3-4):301-311.
The Open Past.Ned Markosian - 1995 - Philosophical Studies 79 (1):95 - 105.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-06-06

Total views
36 ( #298,207 of 2,444,812 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #185,966 of 2,444,812 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes