A utilitarian reply to dr. McCloskey

Abstract
A theory of punishment should tell us not only when punishment is permissible but also when it is a duty. It is not clear whether McCloskey's retributivism is supposed to do this. His arguments against utilitarianism consist largely in examples of punishments unacceptable to the common moral consciousness but supposedly approved of by the consistent utilitarian. We remain unpersuaded to abandon our utilitarianism. The examples are often fanciful in character, a point which (pace McCloskey) does rob them of much of their force. If there was no tension between utilitarian precepts and those which come naturally to plain men, utilitarianism could have no claim to provide a critique of moralities. The utilitarian's attitude to such tensions is somewhat complicated, but what is certain is that there is more room in his system for the sentiments to which McCloskey appeals against him than McCloskey realizes. We agree with McCloskey, however, on the absurdity of substituting rule?utilitarianism for act?utilitarianism as an answer to his attacks. The distinction itself may represent a conceptual confusion. In our view, indeed, unmodified act?utilitarianism provides the best moral basis for thought about punishment
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201746508601434
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,122
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
A Non-Utilitarian Approach to Punishment.H. J. McCloskey - 1965 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):249 – 263.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism.Alex Rajczi - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):857-876.
On the Incoherence Objection to Rule-Utilitarianism.Alex Rajczi - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (4):857-876.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Liberty of Expression its Grounds and Limits (II).D. H. Monro - 1970 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 13 (1-4):238 – 253.
A Dilemma for Objective Act-Utilitarianism.Gerald Lang - 2004 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 3 (2):221-239.
Utilitarian and Retributive Punishment.H. J. McCloskey - 1967 - Journal of Philosophy 64 (3):91-110.
A Non-Utilitarian Approach to Punishment.H. J. McCloskey - 1965 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 8 (1-4):249 – 263.
Added to PP index
2009-02-04

Total downloads
90 ( #59,238 of 2,191,293 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #59,442 of 2,191,293 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature