A Wittgenstein for Postliberal Theologians

Modern Theology 32 (4):622-658 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Remarkably, the theological discourse surrounding Hans Frei and postliberal theology has continued for nearly thirty years since Frei's death. This is due not only to the complex and provocative character of Frei's work, nor only to his influence upon an array of thinkers who went on to shape the theological field in their own right. It is just as indebted to the critical responses that his thinking continues to inspire. One recurrent point of criticism takes aim at Frei's use of Ludwig Wittgenstein's later work for theological ends. In his recent book Liberalism versus Postliberalism: The Great Divide in Twentieth Century Theology, John Allan Knight challenges what he sees as Frei's dependence on problematic Wittgensteinian assumptions. This article raises a few concerns about Knight's charges against Frei. Specifically, I argue that Knight's account tends to conflate the work of Wittgenstein and Frei. It does this by undervaluing two determinative features of Frei's work: (1) its basic Christological orientation; and (2) its Christologically motivated use of ad hoc apologetics. I argue that the Wittgensteinian view that Knight attributes to Frei is not Frei's view at all, and is, moreover, a problematic account of Wittgenstein on its own terms. Finally, Knight's claim that Frei's work “depends upon” and “is suffused” with the understanding of Wittgenstein that Knight attributes to him is based upon an account of Frei's treatment of the sensus literalis that is not entirely accurate. Without question, Knight does remarkable service to Frei's legacy by keeping important debates over his work alive. In what follows, I propose several points where I think Knight's account might be further enriched. The result, I hope, will be a more nuanced understanding of the ways that Frei actually appropriated and deployed Wittgenstein's thought. I will contextualize my account of Frei with reference both to Wittgenstein's writings and the literature surrounding his writings. Setting forth these accounts in tandem should help make further available Wittgenstein's work for subsequent work by postliberal theologians.



External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Carta abierta a Ernesto -Ché- Guevara.Frei Betto - 2007 - Utopía y Praxis Latinoamericana 12 (38):127-130.
Frei handeln - frei sein.Dorothée Welp - 1979 - Freiburger Zeitschrift für Philosophie Und Theologie 26:25-53.
Freiheit und Verantwortung bei Heidegger und Gadamer.Morten S. Thaning - 2013 - In Diego D'Angelo, Sylvaine Gourdain, Tobias Keiling & Nikola Mirkovic (eds.), Frei sein, frei handeln. Freiheit zwischen theoretischer und praktischer Philosophie. Alber. pp. 29-57.
Das Geschehen der Freiheit. Heideggers ontologischer Freiheitsbegriff.Stefan W. Schmidt - 2013 - Frei Sein, Frei Handeln. Freiheit Zwischen Theoretischer Und Praktischer Philosophie.
Individuelle Freiheit beim frühen Georg Simmel.Johannes Krämmer - 2013 - In Diego D'Angelo, Sylvaine Gourdain, Tobias Keiling & Nikola Mirkovic (eds.), Frei sein, frei handeln. Freiheit zwischen theoretischer und praktischer Philosophie. pp. 58-75.
Hans frei and phenomenological hermeneutics.Walter Lowe - 1992 - Modern Theology 8 (2):133-144.


Added to PP

1,112 (#7,764)

6 months
68 (#26,523)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Springs
University of Notre Dame

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Wittgenstein on following a rule.John McDowell - 1984 - Synthese 58 (March):325-364.

Add more references