Meaning vs. Power: Are Thick Description and Power Analysis intrinsically at odds? Response to Interpretation, Explanation, and Clifford Geertz

Religion Compass 6 (12):534-542 (2012)


This essay clarifies and defends the methodological multidimensionality and improvisational character of Clifford Geertz’s account of interpretation and explanation. In contrast to accounts of power analysis offered by Michel Foucault and Talal Asad, I argue that Geertz’s work can simultaneously attend to meaning, power, identity, and experience in understanding and assessing religious practices and cultural formations.

Download options


External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library


Added to PP

1,055 (#6,113)

6 months
59 (#13,145)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1949 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 141:125-126.
The Concept of Mind.Gilbert Ryle - 1950 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 1 (4):328-332.
On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47:5-20.
On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme.Donald Davidson - 2011 - In Robert B. Talisse & Scott F. Aikin (eds.), The Pragmatism Reader: From Peirce Through the Present. Princeton University Press. pp. 286-298.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Handlung, Text, Kultur. Überlegungen Zur Hermeneutischen Anthropologie Zwischen Clifford Geertz Und Paul Ricoeur.Thiemo Breyer - 2013 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 5 (1):107-129.
Art as a Cultural System.Clifford Geertz, Daniil Aronson & Andrei Korbut - 2010 - Russian Sociological Review 9 (2):31-54.