Consensual Decision-Making Among Epistemic Peers

Episteme 6 (2):110-129 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This paper focuses on the question of how to resolve disagreement and uses the Lehrer-Wagner model as a formal tool for investigating consensual decision-making. The main result consists in a general definition of when agents treat each other as epistemic peers (Kelly 2005; Elga 2007), and a theorem vindicating the “equal weight view” to resolve disagreement among epistemic peers. We apply our findings to an analysis of the impact of social network structures on group deliberation processes, and we demonstrate their stability with the help of numerical simulations.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 79,912

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Formal Modeling in Social Epistemology.Stephan Hartmann, Carlo Martini & Jan Sprenger (eds.) - 2010 - Logic Journal of the IGPL (special issue).
Nicolai Hartmann's Theory of Psyche.Carlo Scognamiglio - 2011 - In Roberto Poli, Carlo Scognamiglio & Frederic Tremblay (eds.), The Philosophy of Nicolai Hartmann. Walter de Gruyter. pp. 141.
Road to Jerusalem.Carlo Maria Martini & Yaakov Mascetti - 2007 - Common Knowledge 13 (2-3):512-530.
The Future of Philosophy of Science: Introduction.Stephan Hartmann & Jan Sprenger - 2012 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (2):157-159.
The role of experts in the methodology of economics.Carlo Martini - 2014 - Journal of Economic Methodology 21 (1):77-91.


Added to PP

360 (#35,960)

6 months
7 (#129,194)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Jan Sprenger
University of Turin
Carlo Martini
Tilburg University
Stephan Hartmann
Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München

References found in this work

Epistemology of disagreement: The good news.David Christensen - 2007 - Philosophical Review 116 (2):187-217.
Reflection and disagreement.Adam Elga - 2007 - Noûs 41 (3):478–502.
Peer disagreement and higher order evidence.Thomas Kelly - 2010 - In Alvin I. Goldman & Dennis Whitcomb (eds.), Social Epistemology: Essential Readings. Oxford University Press. pp. 183--217.
The epistemic significance of disagreement.Thomas Kelly - 2005 - In Tamar Szabó Gendler & John Hawthorne (eds.), Oxford Studies in Epistemology, Volume 1. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 167-196.

View all 18 references / Add more references