Journal of Business Ethics 33 (4):287 - 297 (2001)
The question of whether, and to what extent, business managers have obligations to stakeholders has been the principal theme in much of recent business ethics literature. The question of whether shareholders have obligations to stakeholders, however, has not been addressed sufficiently. I provide some needed attention to this matter by examining the positions of shareholders in the contemporary world of investing. Their positions are considerably different than that often envisioned by business ethicists and economists where shareholders determine the directions of corporate activities through their voting decisions. Typical contemporary investors rarely control corporate activities. If they own corporate securities directly, generally they own too small an interest to exercise control. And, in most cases, they do not even own corporate securities directly, but, rather, own shares in funds. Because of the positions of shareholders today, it is highly questionable whether most have obligations to stakeholders. This has a significant implication for business managers. Whether or not shareholders have obligations to stakeholders, business managers have a greater obligation to educate shareholders about how corporate activities affect stakeholders. I provide a justification for that obligation and comment on how business managers might begin to fulfill it.
|Keywords||business managers contemporary investing corporate securities culpable ignorance direct model fairness free-riding obligations shareholders stakeholders|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Ethical Investing From a Jewish Perspective.Mark S. Schwartz, Meir Tamari & Daniel Schwab - 2007 - Business and Society Review 112 (1):137-161.
The Stakeholder Model: The Influence of the Ownership and Governance Structures.E. Jansson - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 56 (1):1-13.
Stakeholder Duties: On the Moral Responsibility of Corporate Investors. [REVIEW]Martin E. Sandbu - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (1):97-107.
Similar books and articles
Shareholders Versus Stakeholders: Corporate Mission Statements and Investor Returns.Mohammed Omran, Peter Atrill & John Pointon - 2002 - Business Ethics 11 (4):318–326.
Corporate Failure as a Means to Corporate Responsibility.Dwight R. Lee & Richard B. McKenzie - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (12):969 - 978.
Business Ethics Without Stakeholders.Joseph Heath - 2006 - Business Ethics Quarterly 16 (4):533-558.
A Comparison of Japanese and U.S. Corporate Financial Accountability and its Impact on the Responsibilities of Corporate Managers.Alejandro Hazera - 1995 - Business Ethics Quarterly 5 (3):479-497.
A Model of Value Creation: Strategic View. [REVIEW]Cengiz Haksever, Radha Chaganti & Ronald G. Cook - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 49 (3):295-307.
The Ethics of Going Private.Douglas A. Houston & John S. Howe - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (7):519 - 525.
Courting Shareholders: The Ethical Implications of Altering Corporate Ownership Structures.Cynthia Clark Williams & Lori Verstegen Ryan - 2007 - Business Ethics Quarterly 17 (4):669-688.
The Ethical Implications of Ignoring Shareholder Directives to Remove Antitakeover Provisions.Victoria B. McWilliams - 2008 - Business Ethics Quarterly 18 (3):321-346.
Corporate Democracy and the Rights of Shareholders.William Irvine - 1988 - Journal of Business Ethics 7 (1-2):99 - 108.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads13 ( #351,747 of 2,164,249 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,249 )
How can I increase my downloads?