Occupational Safety and Paternalism: Machan Revisited

Journal of Business Ethics 63 (2):155-173 (2006)

Authors
Earl Spurgin
John Carroll University
Abstract
In 1987, Machan provided a libertarian case against the right to occupational safety. Since before Machan’s essay appeared, many business ethicists and legal scholars have given considerable attention to the overall position Machan endorses: the acceptance of employment at will and the rejection of employee rights. No one yet has given adequate attention, however, to the fact that Machan’s argument against the right to occupational safety actually stands or falls independently of his overall position on employee rights. His argument ultimately rests on two values: the promotion of employee interests and anti-paternalism. Insofar as those who support the right to occupational safety share those values, they must find a strategy for opposing Machan’s argument that preserves those values. In this paper, I demonstrate why Machan’s argument ultimately rests on the promotion of employee interests and anti-paternalism. Then, I develop an objection to Machan’s argument that preserves those values.
Keywords consent  employee rights  employment at will  labor market  legal versus moral rights  libertarianism  live options  negative versus positive rights  occupational safety  unemployment rate
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.1007/s10551-005-3326-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,599
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Paternalism.Gerald Dworkin - 1972 - The Monist 56 (1):64-84.
Rights in the Workplace: A Nozickian Argument. [REVIEW]Ian Maitland - 1989 - Journal of Business Ethics 8 (12):951 - 954.
Paternalism, Surrogacy, and Exploitation.Henrik Kjeldgaard Jørgensen - 2000 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 10 (1):39-58.

View all 30 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Human Rights, Workers' Rights, and the “Right” to Occupational Safety.Tibor R. Machan - forthcoming - Moral Rights in the Workplace, Albany, Ny: State University of New York Press, as Reprinted in White, Ti (1993). Business Ethics: A Philosophical Reader. New York: Macmillan.
Occupational Safety and Health Act … and the Hospital.Barbara Atz - 1975 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 3 (3):6-8.
The FDA, Preemption, and Public Safety.Lawrence O. Gostin - 2011 - Hastings Center Report 41 (5):11-12.
Occupational Safety and Health.Bridget M. Hutter - 2010 - In Peter Cane & Herbert M. Kritzer (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Empirical Legal Research. Oxford University Press.
Anarchosurrealism Revisited.Tibor R. Machan - 1982 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 12 (2):197.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
41 ( #215,421 of 2,280,558 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #568,325 of 2,280,558 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature