Res Publica 25 (1):1-19 (2019)

Earl Spurgin
John Carroll University
Revelations of personal matters often have negative consequences for social-media users. These consequences trigger frequent warnings, practical rather than moral in nature, that social-media users should consider carefully what they reveal about themselves since their revelations might cause them various difficulties in the future. I set aside such practical considerations and argue that social-media users have a moral obligation to maintain their own privacy that is rooted in the duty to self-censor. Although Anita L. Allen provides a paternalist justification of the duty that supports my position that social-media users are obligated to self-censor what they reveal about themselves, I justify the obligation through considerations that are more palatable to liberals than is paternalism. I accomplish this by arguing that the failure to self-censor often creates for others undue burdens that individuals are obligated morally not to create. In particular, social-media revelations often create undue burdens for those, such as employers and university personnel, who are obligated morally to respect individuals’ privacy in their decision-making processes. I also demonstrate that this argument is not for a broad duty to self-censor, but, rather, for a narrow duty that applies to particular circumstances such as certain uses of social media.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11158-017-9378-x
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 51,232
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Concealment and Exposure.Thomas Nagel - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1):3-30.
Why Privacy is Important.James Rachels - 1975 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 4 (4):323-333.
Privacy: Its Meaning and Value.Adam D. Moore - 2003 - American Philosophical Quarterly 40 (3):215 - 227.

View all 42 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Surrogate Decision Making in the Internet Age.Jessica Berg - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (10):28-33.
Thinking Social Media From Ethical Viewpoint.Joji Nakaya - 2015 - Asian Journal of Business Ethics 4 (1):1-13.
Grundfragen und Schwerpunkte einer Mediennutzerethik.Martin Leiner - 2014 - Zeitschrift Für Evangelische Ethik 58 (4):248-260.
Privacy and Social Networking Technology.Richard A. Spinello - 2011 - International Review of Information Ethics 16:12.
Excellent Online Friendships: An Aristotelian Defense of Social Media.Alexis Elder - 2014 - Ethics and Information Technology 16 (4):287-297.
Four Pillars of Internet Research Ethics with Web 2.0.Barry Rooke - 2013 - Journal of Academic Ethics 11 (4):265-268.


Added to PP index

Total views
23 ( #425,336 of 2,329,886 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #582,921 of 2,329,886 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes