What's Wrong with Computer-Generated Images of Perfection in Advertising?

Journal of Business Ethics 45 (3):257 - 268 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Advertisers often use computers to create fantastic images. Generally, these are perfectly harmless images that are used for comic or dramatic effect. Sometimes, however, they are problematic human images that I call computer-generated images of perfection. Advertisers create these images by using computer technology to remove unwanted traits from models or to generate entire human bodies. They are images that portray ideal human beauty, bodies, or looks. In this paper, I argue that the use of such images is unethical. I begin by explaining the common objections against advertising and by demonstrating how critics might argue that those objections apply to computer-generated images of perfection. Along the way, I demonstrate an ethically significant difference between computer-generated images of perfection and the images in ordinary ads. I argue that although critics might use this fact to apply the common objections to the use of computer-generated images of perfection, the objections fail. Finally, I argue that despite surviving the common objections, the use of computer-generated images of perfection is subject to an ethical objection that is based on aesthetic considerations. Advertisers are ethically obligated to avoid certain aesthetic results that are produced by computer-generated images of perfection.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,642

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

How Do You Solve a Problem like DALL-E 2?Kathryn Wojtkiewicz - forthcoming - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism.
Buddhist Images of Human Perfection.Nathan Katz - 1985 - Religious Studies 21 (1):105-106.
Immaculateness and Research Practice.D. P. Dash, Héctor R. Ponce & Gerard de Zeeuw - 2006 - Journal of Research Practice 2 (1):Article E1.
Why Images?Megan Delehanty - 2010 - Medicine Studies 2 (3):161-173.
Foundation of computational visualistics.Jörg R. J. Schirra - 2005 - Deutscher Universitätsverlag.
Images of Native Americans in advertising: Some moral issues.Michael K. Green - 1993 - Journal of Business Ethics 12 (4):323-330.
Imagination and the Distinction between Image and Intuition in Kant.R. Brian Tracz - 2019 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 6:1087-1120.


Added to PP

6 (#711,559)

6 months
128 (#140,457)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Earl Spurgin
John Carroll University

References found in this work

Manipulative Advertising.Tom L. Beauchamp - 1984 - Business and Professional Ethics Journal 3 (3-4):1-22.
Honesty in Marketing.Jennifer Jackson - 1990 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (1):51-60.
Bulemia and anorexia in an advertising context.Robin T. Peterson - 1987 - Journal of Business Ethics 6 (6):495 - 504.

Add more references