Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (3):291-292 (2004)
Abstract |
The blinkered debate on organ donation neglects the widening gap between the developed and developing worldsThe current debate about organ donation and the associated advocacy for selling kidneys, while laudable for its concern about increasing the ability to save the lives of some people with chronic renal failure, is characterised by four features that locate the reasoning process within a narrow and inadequate framework. Firstly, the focus on saving lives is myopic, with the lives of the most privileged in the world receiving most attention. Secondly, the debate is firmly set within a value system in which market values dominate. Thirdly, health is considered from a highly individualistic perspective with little understanding of the importance of social solidarity in health. Finally, a constricted moral vocabulary is used to discuss the ethics of organ sales.MYOPIC CONCERN FOR SAVING LIVESMany articles making pleas for more organs begin by describing the number of people waiting for donated organs, the number of donors who could give organs but are not doing so, and how many lives could be saved if more organs could be made available. Great concern is expressed about a few thousand …
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | 10.1136/jme.2003.007294 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Nepharious Goings On: Kidney Sales and Moral Arguments.Janet Radcliffe Richards - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (4):375--416.
Citations of this work BETA
Solidarity: A (New) Ethic for Global Health Policy. [REVIEW]Shawn H. E. Harmon - 2006 - Health Care Analysis 14 (4):215-236.
When Listening to the People: Lessons From Complementary and Alternative Medicine (Cam) for Bioethics. [REVIEW]Monika Clark-Grill - 2010 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 7 (1):71-81.
Bioethics, (Funding) Priorities, and the Perpetuation of Injustice.Rachel Fabi & Daniel S. Goldberg - forthcoming - American Journal of Bioethics:1-14.
Class and Ethnicity in the Global Market for Organs: The Case of Korean Cinema. [REVIEW]Rebecca Garden & Hyon Joo Yoo Murphree - 2007 - Journal of Medical Humanities 28 (4):213-229.
Similar books and articles
Blinkered Objections to Bioethics: A Response to Benatar.J. Taylor - 2005 - Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (3):179-181.
Bioethics: Power and Injustice: Iab Presidential Address.Solomon R. Benatar - 2003 - Bioethics 17 (5-6):387-399.
The Social Functions of Bioethics in South Africa.Anton van Niekerk & Solomon Benatar - 2011 - In Catherine Myser (ed.), Bioethics Around the Globe. Oxford University Press.
The Future of Life and Death: Contemporary Bioethics in Europe and Japan.Susumu Shimazono & Shimauchi Hiroe (eds.) - 2007 - Sangensha Publishers.
On the Nature and Sociology of Bioethics.Mark Sheehan & Michael Dunn - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):54-69.
Bioethics: Latin American Perspectives.Arleen L. F. Salles & María Julia Bertomeu (eds.) - 2002 - Rodopi.
What’s the Point of Philosophical Bioethics?Iain Brassington - 2013 - Health Care Analysis 21 (1):20-30.
An Apology for Socratic Bioethics.Franklin G. Miller & Robert D. Truog - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):3 – 7.
Human Dignity and Bioethics: Essays Commissioned by the President's Council on Bioethics.Adam Schulman (ed.) - 2008 - [President's Council on Bioethics.
Circumcision as Human-Rights Violation: Assessing Benatar and Benatar.Rio Cruz, Leonard B. Glick & John W. Travis - 2003 - American Journal of Bioethics 3 (2):19 – 20.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2010-08-24
Total views
25 ( #421,275 of 2,421,247 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #249,279 of 2,421,247 )
2010-08-24
Total views
25 ( #421,275 of 2,421,247 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #249,279 of 2,421,247 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads