Centre for Science Studies, University of Aarhus (2012)
Since 2004, it has been mandated by law that all Danish undergraduate university programmes have to include a compulsory course on the philosophy of science for that particular program. At the Faculty of Science and Technology, Aarhus University, the responsibility for designing and running such courses were given to the Centre for Science Studies, where a series of courses were developed aiming at the various bachelor educations of the Faculty. Since 2005, the Centre has been running a dozen different courses ranging from mathematics, computer science, physics, chemistry over medical chemistry, biology, molecular biology to sports science, geology, molecular medicine, nano science, and engineering. We have adopted a teaching philosophy of using historical and contemporary case studies to anchor broader philosophical discussions in the particular subject discipline under consideration. Thus, the courses are tailored to the interests of the students of the particular programme whilst aiming for broader and important philosophical themes as well as addressing the specific mandated requirements to integrate philosophy, some introductory ethics, and some institutional history. These are multiple and diverse purposes which cannot be met except by compromise. In this short presentation, we discuss our ambitions for using case studies to discuss philosophical issues and the relation between the specific philosophical discussions in the disciplines and the broader themes of philosophy of science. We give examples of the cases chosen to discuss various issues of scientific knowledge, the role of experiments, the relations between mathematics and science, and the issues of responsibility and trust in scientific results. Finally, we address the issue of how and why science students can be interested in and benefit from mandatory courses in the philosophy of their subject.
|Keywords||philosophy of science for science students|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Teaching Science at the University Level: What About the Ethics?Penny J. Gilmer - 1995 - Science and Engineering Ethics 1 (2):173-180.
Teaching Science and Ethics to Undergraduates: A Multidisciplinary Approach.Alan H. McGowan - 2013 - Science and Engineering Ethics 19 (2):535-543.
Science Teaching: The Role of History and Philosophy of Science.Michael R. Matthews - 1994 - Routledge.
When Science Studies Religion: Six Philosophy Lessons for Science Classes.Massimo Pigliucci - 2013 - Science and Education 22 (1):49-67.
Scientific Inquiry: Readings in the Philosophy of Science.Robert Klee (ed.) - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Philosophy of Chemistry and the Image of Science.Rein Vihalemm - 2007 - Foundations of Science 12 (3):223-234.
Competencies in Premedical and Medical Education The AAMC–HHMI Report.Robert J. Alpern, Richard Belitsky & Sharon Long - 2011 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54 (1):30-35.
Copernican Questions: A Concise Invitation to the Philosophy of Science.Keith M. Parsons - 2005 - Mcgraw-Hill.
Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence: A Course Outline.William J. Rapaport - 1986 - Teaching Philosophy 9 (2):103-120.
Philosophy of Mathematics.Christopher Pincock - 2011 - In J. Saatsi & S. French (eds.), Companion to the Philosophy of Science. Continuum. pp. 314-333.
Philosophy of Science: The Link Between Science and Philosophy.Philipp Frank - 1957 - Dover Publications.
Added to index2012-09-27
Total downloads90 ( #56,746 of 2,158,810 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #132,568 of 2,158,810 )
How can I increase my downloads?