Classical Quarterly 71 (1):95-107 (2021)

Authors
S. Keller Anders
Portland Community College
Abstract
The political outlook of the so-called ‘Anonymus Iamblichi’ has been a subject of controversy in the scholarly literature, with some commentators judging him to be a committed democrat, while others see in him a partisan of aristocracy or even oligarchy. This disagreement is not surprising, for the text contains passages that seem to pull in opposite directions. The article suggests that we move beyond the one-dimensional oligarch-or-democrat model traditionally employed and instead approach the issue from a fresh angle, applying the more nuanced typology for understanding ancient social criticism developed by Josiah Ober.The article begins by situating the author within the social landscape of classical Athens. The resulting characterization presents the author as a representative of a distinctive social type: the Athenian ‘rich quietist’, who prefers private economic endeavours to engagement in public affairs, and who is ideologically committed to democratic government but also highly critical of how democratic society treats its wealthy citizens. This characterization helps make better sense of the seemingly contradictory political indications in the text. In particular, fragments 6 and 7 should be read as a single line of argument, which takes the form of an ‘immanent critique’ of contemporary Athenian democracy. According to ‘Anonymus Iamblichi’, democratic society rightly praises the rule of law as a distinctive democratic value, but it falls disappointingly short of that ideal in its treatment of its own wealthy elite citizens.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0009838821000288
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,274
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reflections on Habermas on Democracy.Joshua Cohen - 1999 - Ratio Juris 12 (4):385-416.
Dissenting with Ober.J. Euben - 2000 - Polis 17 (1-2):111-132.
On the Very Idea of a Democratic Empire.Antoine Côté - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:31-35.
On the Very Idea of a Democratic Empire.Antoine Côté - 2006 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 2:31-35.
Xenophon as a Critic of the Athenian Democracy.Ron Kroeker - 2009 - History of Political Thought 30 (2):197-228.
Towards Confucian Democratic Meritocracy.Kyung Rok Kwon - 2020 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 46 (9):1053-1075.
Democratic Justice: The Priority of Politics and the Ideal of Citizenship.Valentina Gentile - 2017 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 20 (2):211-221.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2021-05-07

Total views
1 ( #1,500,109 of 2,448,651 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,803 of 2,448,651 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes