Hypatia 25 (4):825-833 (2010)
Ethicists of care have objected to traditional moral philosophy's reliance upon abstract universal principles. They claim that the use of abstraction renders traditional theories incapable of capturing morally relevant, particular features of situations. I argue that this objection sometimes conflates two different levels of moral thinking: the level of justification and the level of deliberation. Specifically, I claim that abstraction or attention to context at the level of justification does not entail, as some critics seem to think, a commitment to abstraction or attention to context at the level of deliberation. It follows that critics who reject a theory's use of abstraction at the level of justification have not shown that the theory recommends abstraction at the level of deliberation and that it, therefore, compels the deliberating agent to overlook morally salient details
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education.Nel Noddings - 1984 - University of California Press.
Love's Labor: Essays on Women, Equality and Dependence.Eva Feder Kittay - 1999 - Routledge.
A Theory of Justice.John Rawls - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Philosophy and Rhetoric. Oxford University Press. pp. 133-135.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A General Theory of Abstraction Operators.Neil Tennant - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (214):105-133.
A Theory of Scientific Model Construction: The Conceptual Process of Abstraction and Concretisation. [REVIEW]Demetris P. Portides - 2005 - Foundations of Science 10 (1):67-88.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads45 ( #110,515 of 2,146,265 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #386,504 of 2,146,265 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.