Minds and Machines 13 (1):115-153 (2003)
Does Nature permit the implementation of behaviours that cannot be simulated computationally? We consider the meaning of physical computation in some detail, and present arguments in favour of physical hypercomputation: for example, modern scientific method does not allow the specification of any experiment capable of refuting hypercomputation. We consider the implications of relativistic algorithms capable of solving the (Turing) Halting Problem. We also reject as a fallacy the argument that hypercomputation has no relevance because non-computable values are indistinguishable from sufficiently close computable approximations. In addition to considering the nature of computability relative to any given physical theory, we can consider the relationship between versions of computability corresponding to different models of physics. Deutsch and Penrose have argued on mathematical grounds that quantum computation and Turing computation have equivalent formal power. We suggest this equivalence is invalid when considered from the physical point of view, by highlighting a quantum computational behaviour that cannot meaningfully be considered feasible in the classical universe.
|Keywords||Church–Turing thesis computability hypercomputation recursion scientific method super-Turing machine|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Evolved Computing Devices and the Implementation Problem.Lukáš Sekanina - 2007 - Minds and Machines 17 (3):311-329.
Similar books and articles
Quantum Hypercomputation—Hype or Computation?Amit Hagar & Alex Korolev - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (3):347-363.
Concrete Digital Computation: What Does It Take for a Physical System to Compute? [REVIEW]Nir Fresco - 2011 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 20 (4):513-537.
On the Possibility, or Otherwise, of Hypercomputation.Philip D. Welch - 2004 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 55 (4):739-746.
SAD Computers and Two Versions of the Church–Turing Thesis.Tim Button - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (4):765-792.
The Diagonal Method and Hypercomputation.Toby Ord & Tien D. Kieu - 2005 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 56 (1):147-156.
Hypercomputation and the Physical Church-Turing Thesis.Paolo Cotogno - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):181-223.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads42 ( #118,075 of 2,143,899 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,257 of 2,143,899 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.