Contraction and revision
Australasian Journal of Logic 13 (3):58-77 (2016)
| Authors |
|
| Abstract |
An important question for proponents of non-contractive approaches to paradox is why contraction fails. Zardini offers an answer, namely that paradoxical sentences exhibit a kind of instability. I elaborate this idea using revision theory, and I argue that while instability does motivate failures of contraction, it equally motivates failure of many principles that non-contractive theorists want to maintain.
|
| Keywords | non-contractive theory of truth revision theory sequents |
| Categories | (categorize this paper) |
| DOI | 10.26686/ajl.v13i3.3935 |
| Options |
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Request removal from index
|
Download options
External links
(no proxy) Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver..
- Configure custom resolver
References found in this work BETA
Two Flavors of Curry’s Paradox.Jc Beall & Julien Murzi - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy 110 (3):143-165.
Conservatively Extending Classical Logic with Transparent Truth.David Ripley - 2012 - Review of Symbolic Logic 5 (2):354-378.
View all 37 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Guest Editors’ Introduction.Riccardo Bruni & Shawn Standefer - 2019 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 48 (1):1-9.
Infinitary Contraction‐Free Revenge.Andreas Fjellstad - 2018 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 7 (3):179-189.
Similar books and articles
Foundational Belief Change.Abhaya C. Nayak - 1994 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 23 (5):495 - 533.
How to Give It Up: A Survey of Some Formal Aspects of the Logic of Theory Change.David Makinson - 1986 - Synthese 68 (1):185 - 186.
How to Give It Up: A Survey of Some Formal Aspects of the Logic of Theory Change.David Makinson - 1985 - Synthese 62 (3):347 - 363.
Contractions of Noncontractive Consequence Relations.Rohan French & David Ripley - 2015 - Review of Symbolic Logic 8 (3):506-528.
Safe Contraction Revisited.Hans Rott & Sven Ove Hansson - 2014 - In Sven Ove Hansson (ed.), David Makinson on Classical Methods for Non-Classical Problems (Outstanding Contributions to Logic, Vol. 3). Dordrecht: Springer. pp. 35–70.
Infobase Change: A First Approximation. [REVIEW]Thomas Andreas Meyer, Willem Adrian Labuschagne & Johannes Heidema - 2000 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 9 (3):353-377.
A Survey of Multiple Contractions.André Fuhrmann & Sven Ove Hansson - 1994 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 3 (1):39-75.
Norm-System Revision: Theory and Application. [REVIEW]Audun Stolpe - 2010 - Artificial Intelligence and Law 18 (3):247-283.
Four Floors for the Theory of Theory Change: The Case of Imperfect Discrimination.Hans Rott - 2014 - In Eduardo Fermé & João Leite (eds.), Logics in Artificial Intelligence: 13th European Conference (JELIA 2014). Cham: Springer. pp. 368–382.
Conditionals in Theories of Truth.Anil Gupta & Shawn Standefer - 2017 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 46 (1):27-63.
Set-Theoretic Absoluteness and the Revision Theory of Truth.Benedikt Löwe & Philip D. Welch - 2001 - Studia Logica 68 (1):21-41.
Global and Iterated Contraction and Revision: An Exploration of Uniform and Semi-Uniform Approaches. [REVIEW]Sven Ove Hansson - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (1):143-172.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2016-04-19
Total views
307 ( #22,072 of 2,309,545 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #14,497 of 2,309,545 )
2016-04-19
Total views
307 ( #22,072 of 2,309,545 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
50 ( #14,497 of 2,309,545 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
