Comments on William Harper's “ISaac Newton's Scientific Method”

Modern Schoolman 87 (3-4):303-313 (2010)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords Catholic Tradition  History of Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-8402
DOI 10.5840/schoolman2010873/412
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,692
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Sir Isaac Newton's Theory of Scientific Method.Ralph M. Blake - 1933 - Philosophical Review 42 (5):453-486.
Method and Metaphysics in Sir Isaac Newton.E. A. Burtt - 1943 - Philosophy of Science 10 (2):57-66.
The Argument(s) for Universal Gravitation.Steffen Ducheyne - 2006 - Foundations of Science 11 (4):419-447.
Comments on I. J. Good.William L. Harper - 1975 - Synthese 30 (1-2):75 - 78.
Comments on Westphal.William L. Harper - 2007 - Dialogue 46 (4):729-736.
A Portrait of Isaac Newton (Review).Edward W. Strong - 1971 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (2):255-256.
Is God Exclusively a Father?George F. Isham - 1996 - Faith and Philosophy 13 (2):266-271.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #329,731 of 2,158,385 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #355,511 of 2,158,385 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums