Don’t Change the Subject: Interpreting Public Discourse over Quid pro Quo

Business Ethics Quarterly 7 (3):93-116 (1997)

Abstract
A quid pro quo is an exchange of value between a citizen or group—often a businessperson or organization—and an official; whatthe citizen or group offers can take either monetary or nonmonetary form and what the official supplies, in return, is some kind of public act. Despite the fact that instances of quid pro quo seem continually to compel public attention, very few rise to the level of bribery; i.e., the level in which they are resolved judicially. In part, quid pro quo eludes judicial forums for factual reasons: It is difficult to prove. And in part, the reasons are normative: The distinction between objectionable quid pro quo and acceptable democratic norms—on which citizens and groups ought to be able to support officials who are in turn responsive to them—is difficult to draw. Hence, a great gray area of quid pro quo finds itself resolved (or at least debated) in political forums. In what follows I examine central strands of American public discourse over the factual and normative issues of quid pro quo. My purpose is to articulate those principles which most parsimoniously account for its structure, and to explore what presuppositions various discourse-participants either explicitly or implicitly bring to bear in determining whether a situation constitutes a troubling quid pro quo
Keywords Applied Philosophy  Business and Professional Ethics  Social Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1052-150X  
DOI 10.2307/3857316
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,728
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Professional Societies and Industry Support: What Is the Quid Pro Quo?Jerome P. Kassirer - 2007 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 50 (1):7-17.
Duns Scotus’s Account of a Propter Quid Science of the Categories.Lloyd Newton - 2004 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 78:145-160.
Sexual Harassment in the Public Accounting Profession?Brian B. Stanko & Mark Schneider - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):185 - 200.
Quo OHRP?: Faithful Arbiter or Pro Wrestling Ref?Timothy Dolan - 2010 - American Journal of Bioethics 10 (9):53-55.
Extraneous Intrusions in Moral Temptation Can Switch Decisions.Percy Black - 1993 - Journal of Moral Education 22 (2):139-156.
Preferences, Welfare, and the Status-Quo Bias.Dale Dorsey - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (3):535-554.
Self-Defense, Punishing Unjust Combatants and Justice in War.Steve Viner - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (3):297-319.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-12-01

Total views
25 ( #344,816 of 2,264,657 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #99,858 of 2,264,657 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature