EPR-Bohr-Bell and Nonlocality
"Indeed I have very little idea of what this means. I do not understand in what sense the word `mechanical' is used, in characterizing the disturbances that Bohr does not contemplate, as distinct from those he does. I do not know what the italicized passage means--- `an influence on the very conditions...' . Could it mean just that different experiments on the first system give different kinds of information about the second? But this was one of the main points of EPR, who observed that one could learn *either* the position *or* the momentum of the second system..... Is Bohr just rejecting the premise--- `no action at a distance'---rather than refuting the argument?"
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Causation, Measurement Relevance and No-Conspiracy in EPR.Iñaki San Pedro - 2011 - European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (1):137-156.
Nonlocality and the Aharonov-Bohm Effect.Richard Healey - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (1):18-41.
Quantum Reference Frames in the Context of EPR.Michael Dickson - 2004 - Philosophy of Science 71 (5):655-668.
Niels Bohr's Interpretation and the Copenhagen Interpretation—Are the Two Incompatible?Ravi Gomatam - 2007 - Philosophy of Science 74 (5):736-748.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #171,812 of 2,172,018 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #325,967 of 2,172,018 )
How can I increase my downloads?