Review of Metaphysics 66 (2):339-352 (2012)

Authors
Phillip Stambovsky
Boston College
Abstract
“Considered objectively, there can be only one human reason, there... can be only one true system of philosophy from principles, in however many different and even conflicting ways one has philosophized about the same proposition”—so declares Kant in the Vorrede to the “Doctrine of Right.” Kant makes this observation in the process of framing a striking claim: “prior to the development of critical philosophy there had been no philosophy at all.” Eckart Förster adduces this claim as a point of departure for undertaking “to grasp and understand the single [sic] thought” that orients his ambitious new study, Twenty-Five Years of Philosophy: A Systematic Reconstruction. It is thus with reference to Kant’s pronouncement that Förster propounds his book’s lead thought, or at least the first part of it: “philosophy begins in 1781 and ends in 1806,” this in the sense that over those twenty-five years “philosophy became a science, thereby also arriving at knowledge of itself.” Förster sets himself the task of elucidating the “internal dynamic” of the “fundamental idea” that informs the philosophical-historical thesis to which he keys his investigation. The fundamental idea in question is the classic speculative problematic of objective knowledge, which in the Kantian context of Förster’s study takes the form of the issue of how it is that we know “the supersensible substrate of appearances.” Beyond simply anatomizing this issue, however, the author engages “to reproduce its immanent development,” systematically “reconstructing” it through interlinked analyses of seminal writings of Kant, Fichte, Schelling, Goethe, and Hegel
Keywords Catholic Tradition  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0034-6632
DOI 10.5840/revmetaph2012662314
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,295
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Infinite Understanding, Scientia Intuitiva, and Ethics 1.16.Margaret D. Wilson - 1983 - Midwest Studies in Philosophy 8 (1):181-191.
Spinozas Idee der Scientia intuitiva und die Spinozanische Wissenschaftskonzeption.Wolfgang Röd - 1977 - Zeitschrift für Philosophische Forschung 31 (4):497 - 510.
Locke's Philosophy of Science.Hylarie Kochiras - 2009 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Spinoza’s Scientia Intuitiva.Joseph Grange - 1988 - Philosophy and Theology 2 (3):241-257.
Descartes, Epistemic Principles, Epistemic Circularity, and Scientia.Keith DeRose - 1992 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 73 (3):220-238.
Good Science, Bad Philosophy.Jeffrey Foss - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (6):791-792.
A Case For Idealism.J. N. Mohanty - 1994 - Idealistic Studies 24 (2):163-171.
Husserl: The Idealist Malgré Lui.M. M. van de Pitte - 1976 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 37 (1):70-78.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-04-04

Total views
24 ( #453,822 of 2,448,702 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #447,803 of 2,448,702 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes