In Sandra Lapointe & Clinton Tolley (eds.), The New Anti-Kant. pp. 193–234 (2014)

Authors
Nicholas Stang
University of Toronto, St. George
Abstract
In §12 of his 1837 magnum opus, the Wissenschaftslehre, Bolzano remarks that “In the new logic textbooks one reads almost constantly that ‘in logic one must consider not the material of thought but the mere form of thought, for which reason logic deserves the title of a purely formal science’” (WL §12, 46).1 The sentence Bolzano quotes is his own summary of others’ philosophical views; he goes on to cite Jakob, Hoffbauer, Metz, and Krug as examples of thinkers who held that logic abstracts from the matter of thought and considers only its form. Although Bolzano does not mention Kant by name here, Kant does of course hold that “pure general logic”, what Bolzano would consider logic in the traditional sense (the theory of propositions, representations, inferences, etc.), is formal. As Kant remarks in the Introduction to the 2nd edition of Kritik der reinen Vernunft , (pure general) logic is “justified in abstracting – is indeed obliged to abstract – from all objects of cognition and all of their differences; and in logic, therefore, the understanding has to do with nothing further than itself and its own form” (KrV, Bix).2
Keywords Kant  Bolzano  Logic
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on Amazon.com
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Lectures on Logic.Immanuel KANT - 1992 - Cambridge University Press.
Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism.John MacFarlane - 2002 - Philosophical Review 111 (1):25-65.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Bolzano and Kant on the Nature of Logic.Clinton Tolley - 2012 - History and Philosophy of Logic 33 (4):307-327.
Is Logic Formal? Bolzano, Kant and the Kantian Logicians.Sandra Lapointe - 2012 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 85 (1):11-32.
Kant and Bolzano on Logical Form.Paul Rusnock - 2011 - Kant-Studien 102 (4):477-491.
Logic and Ontology in the Thought of Bolzano.Adam Drozdek - 1997 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 5:3-18.
Bolzano's Logical System.Ettore Casari - 2016 - Oxford University Press UK.
On Bolzano's Concept of a Sum.Paul Rusnock - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):155 - 169.
Theory of Science.Rolf George & Paul Rusnock (eds.) - 2014 - Oxford University Press UK.
Bolzano Versus Kant: Mathematics as a Scientia Universalis.Paola Cantù - 2011 - Philosophical Papers Dedicated to Kevin Mulligan.
From Ordinary Language to Definition in Kant and Bolzano.Waldemar Rohloff - 2012 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 85 (1):131-149.
Zu Bolzanos Kritik der Kantischen Antinomien.Arto Siitonen - 2007 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 21 (1):84-97.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-02-22

Total views
252 ( #36,795 of 2,439,039 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #21,929 of 2,439,039 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes