Authors
Nicholas Stang
University of Toronto, St. George
Abstract
Most commentators agree that the Schematism chapter plays a very important role in the Critique of Pure Reason (CPR). But there is little agreement on what role, exactly, the Schematism is supposed to play and how successfully it plays that role. Many commentators consider it a failure. My aim in this paper is to provide an interpretation of the role of the Schematism and a qualified defense of its main doctrines. The topic of the Schematism is the “subsumption” of objects under concepts, as the first sentence announces: “in all subsumptions of an object under a concept [. . .]“ (A137/B176). Its primary aim is to explain how it is possible for sensible objects to be subsumed specifically under the pure concepts of the understanding (categories). That much is relatively clear. However, “subsumption” admits of two different readings, which previous commentators have not carefully distinguished. In one sense, an object a can be said to be subsumed under a concept F just in case some subject thinks of a that it is F. In another sense, though, an object is only said to be subsumed under a concept when it instantiates that concept, e.g. when a is F. The first notion of subsumption is neutral on the truth of subsumption, whereas, on the second reading, subsumptions as such are true. In this paper I argue that this ambiguity in “subsumption” is the key that unlocks the argument of the Schematism.
Keywords Kant  Schematism  Time
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Kant and the Art of Schematism.Samantha Matherne - 2014 - Kantian Review 19 (2):181-205.
La doctrina kantiana del esquematismo trascendental.Martín Arias-Albisu - 2005 - Areté. Revista de Filosofía 17 (2):155-182.
The Normativity of Kant's Formula of Law of Nature.Mihailov Emilian - 2013 - Romanian Journal of Analytic Philosophy (2):57-81.
The Normativity of Kant's Formula of the Law of Nature.Emilian Mihailov - 2013 - Romanian Journal of Analytic Philosophy (2):57-81.
Kant's Transcendental Schematism.M. Woods - 1983 - Dialectica 37 (3):201-219.
Kantian Themes in Merleau-Ponty’s Theory of Perception.Samantha Matherne - 2016 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 98 (2):193-230.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-05-08

Total views
251 ( #29,707 of 2,324,560 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
135 ( #3,478 of 2,324,560 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes