Kant's Schematism of the categories: An interpretation and defence

European Journal of Philosophy 31 (1):30-64 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of the Schematism chapter of the Critique of Pure Reason is to solve the problem posed by the “inhomogeneity” of intuitions and categories: the sensible properties of objects represented in intuition are of a different kind than the properties represented by categories. Kant's solution is to introduce what he calls “transcendental schemata,” which mediate the subsumption of objects under categories. I reconstruct Kant's solution in terms of two substantive premises, which I call Subsumption Sufficiency (i.e., that subsuming an object under a transcendental schema is sufficient to subsume it under the corresponding category) and Real Possibility (i.e., that it is really possible to subsume objects under each of the transcendental schemata). These two principles, together with a trivial modal one (the Subsumption-Possibility Link), entail that it is possible to subsume objects under categories; in other words, the argument of the Schematism is valid. The main work of the paper consists in reconstructing Kant's arguments for, and explanations of, these premises. I argue that they hinge on Kant's claim that transcendental schemata are “time-determinations,” which I interpret to mean: rules for reflexively representing the temporal relations among our own representational states. On the basis of this reading, I reconstruct Kant's argument for Subsumption Sufficiency, category by category. I also explain why Real Possibility follows almost immediately. Granting Kant the argument up to this point in the Critique, the argument of the Schematism is sound.

Similar books and articles

Making Sense of Kant’s Schematism.Michael Pendlebury - 1995 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 55 (4):777-797.
Kant's Transcendental Schematism.M. Woods - 1983 - Dialectica 37 (3):201-219.
Kant and Performative Schematizations.Aloisia Moser - 2021 - Studies in Transcendental Philosophy 2 (2).
Kant's Concept of Force.Melissa Zinkin - 1999 - Dissertation, Northwestern University
Metaphysics Renewed.Paul Symington - 2011 - International Philosophical Quarterly 51 (3):285-301.
Reading Kant’s doctrine of schematism algebraically.Farhad Alavi - 2020 - Philosophical Forum 51 (3):315-329.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-05-08

Downloads
1,749 (#5,815)

6 months
320 (#6,612)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Nicholas Stang
University of Toronto, St. George

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Critique of Pure Reason.I. Kant - 1787/1998 - Philosophy 59 (230):555-557.
Kant and the Claims of Knowledge.Paul Guyer - 1987 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Bounds of Sense.P. F. Strawson - 1966 - Philosophy 42 (162):379-382.
Kant’s Modal Metaphysics.Nicholas Frederick Stang - 2016 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 45 references / Add more references