Theoria 1 (2):503-511 (1985)
A new essay to analyse the demonstration which Aristotle gave of Barbara ACP (first premise “actual”, second premise “contingent”, conclusion “possible”) is realized with the techniques of mathematicallogic. The critical points (conclusion “possible” from two premises “possible”, problem de dicto - de re, etc) are indicated; based on them it is considered that Aristotle’s proof is not conclusive
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Internalism and the Collapse of the Gettier Problem.Timothy McGrew & Lydia McGrew - 1998 - Journal of Philosophical Research 23:239-256.
Aristotle on the Reducibility of All Valid Syllogistic Moods to the Two Universal Moods of the First Figure (APrA7, 29b1–25). [REVIEW]Hermann Weidemann - 2004 - History and Philosophy of Logic 25 (1):73-78.
The Role of Coherence in Legal Reasoning.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 1984 - Law and Philosophy 3 (3):355 - 374.
``Defeasible Reasoning with Variable Degrees of Justification&Quot.John Pollock - 2001 - Artificial Intelligence 133:233-282.
D-Theories, Discretion, and the Justification of Adjudication.Barbara Baum Levenbook - 1980 - Social Theory and Practice 5 (3-4):331-345.
Knowledge and Justification of the First Principles.Miguel Garcia-Valdecasas - forthcoming - In Niels Öffenberger & Alejandro Vigo (eds.), Iberoamerikanische Beiträge zur modernen Deutung der Aristotelischen Logik. G. Olms.
S4 and Aristotle on Three Syllogisms with Contingent Premisses.Charles J. Kelly - 2002 - Journal of Philosophical Research 27:405-431.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #170,130 of 2,164,554 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #128,935 of 2,164,554 )
How can I increase my downloads?