Negative Dialogues: A Study of Harold Innis and Marshall Mcluhan in the Light of the Negative Dialectics of Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin

Dissertation, University of Toronto (Canada) (1991)

This thesis offers an interpretation of the communications studies of Harold Innis and Marshall McLuhan as a distinctive materialist reading of theoretical concerns similar to those explored by two Frankfurt school theorists, Theodor Adorno and Walter Benjamin. It argues that, although the Canadian and European schools represent philosophical traditions that appear difficult to reconcile, they can be understood as having developed, in response to the positivist traditions they both sought to resist, comparable variants of an epistemology that Adorno termed "negative dialectics", viz., a way of defining objectivity that supersedes the dichotomy of positivism and scepticism. It also argues that Innis' and McLuhan's work remains significant because it fits into a broad, philosophically aware view of communication and consciousness as simultaneous elements of human productivity, and shows how that productivity, as developed in the West, underpins western reason. ;Chapter 1 situates all four theorists in the context of critical literatures on modernity and traces the development of a new epistemology based on the dynamic qualities of dialogue. It then links the two schools thematically by broadening the category of dialectic to include dialogue. It argues that both sets of theorists were concerned with retrieving from that concept, negative elements such as non-determinism and ambiguity, elements long suppressed in western thought. Chapter 2 traces early influences on Innis' thinking, explores his political economy, and shows his early attempts to define a negative dialectic. Chapter 3 explores Innis' communications works. It portrays his concepts of space and time, and his studies of communicative forms of theoretical tools for the study of consciousness. Chapter 4 traces early influences on McLuhan's thought; it presents his philosophical framework as an historicised version of Thomism. It ends by comparing McLuhan's The Mechanical Bride with Innis' work on the press, and Adorno's and Benjamin's critiques of the culture industry. Chapter 5 focuses on McLuhan's early communications studies, specifically, The Gutenberg Galaxy, and argues that a sharp distinction needs to be made between the early historical writings and later ones, which became progressively more static. Chapter 6 attempts a dialogue between all four theorists on the subject of oral communication. It argues that each school has developed a distinctive bias, and that each would benefit from being read, in the spirit of negative dialectics, in the light of the other
Keywords McLuhan, Marshall   Innis, Harold Adams   Adorno, Theodor W   Benjamin, Walter   Communication   Critical theory   Philosophy, Modern
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0315692472
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,060
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Review. [REVIEW]Gillian Rose - 1979 - History and Theory 18:126-135.
Susan Buck-Morss, "The Origins of Negative Dialectics". [REVIEW]Peter Hohendahl - 1977 - Telos: Critical Theory of the Contemporary 34:184.
Nonidentity, Negative Experience and the Pre‐Reflective Cogito.Gillian Howie - 2015 - European Journal of Philosophy 23 (3):589-607.


Added to PP index

Total views

Recent downloads (6 months)

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes