Natural science, social science, and democratic practice: Some political implications of the distinction between the natural and the human sciences
Philosophy of the Social Sciences 22 (3):337-356 (1992)
This article examines some of the contributions to the contemporary debate over the question of whether there is an important distinction to be made between the natural and the human sciences. In particular, the article looks at the arguments that Charles Taylor has put forward for the recognition of a radical discontinuity between these forms of science and then examines Richard Rorty's objections to Taylor's distinction and argues that Rorty misunderstands the reasons for this distinction and thereby misses the political implications of failing to make such a distinction. In this regard, some arguments made by Anthony Giddens and John O'Neill, respectively, around Alfred Schutz's "postulate of adequacy" are used to show how the social sciences must be conceived so as to avoid consequences inimical to the reproduction and maintenance of participatory, democratic institutions. Additionally, the article uses O'Neill's argument that the Schutzian conceptualization of interpretive sciences can be critical in a way that Giddens and Jürgen Habermas require, while including a translation and accountability principle, to demonstrate how we ought to respect participatory, democratic forms
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Essential Nature of the Method of the Natural Sciences: Response to A. T. Nuyen's "Truth, Method, and Objectivity: Husserl and Gadamer on Scientific Method".Joseph Becker - 1993 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 23 (1):73-76.
Romantic Longings, Moral Ideals, and Democratic Priorities: On Richard Rorty's Use of the Distinction Between the Private and the Public.Sterling Lynch - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (1):97 – 120.
Husserl, Weber, Freud, and the Method of the Human Sciences.Donald McIntosh - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (3):328-353.
Understanding Versus Explanation? How to Think About the Distinction Between the Human and the Natural Sciences.Karsten R. Stueber - 2012 - Inquiry 55 (1):17 - 32.
Karl Popper's Political Philosophy of Social Science.Geoff Stokes - 1997 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 27 (1):56-79.
Rawls and Natural Aristocracy.Matthew Clayton - 2001 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 1 (3):239-259.
Participatory Action Research: Should Social Inquiry Be Conducted Democratically?Leonard Krimerman - 2001 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (1):60-82.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads14 ( #331,143 of 2,163,853 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,100 of 2,163,853 )
How can I increase my downloads?