Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 9 (2):201-229 (2006)

Authors
Rebecca Stangl
University of Virginia
Abstract
According to radical moral particularists such as Jonathan Dancy, there are no substantive moral principles. And yet, few particularists wish to deny that something very like moral principles do indeed play a significant role in our everyday moral practice. Loathe at dismissing this as mere error on the part of everyday moral agents, particularists have proposed a number of alternative accounts of the practice. The aim of all of these accounts is to make sense of our appeal to general moral truths in both reaching and justifying our particular moral judgments without thereby violating the particularists' stricture against substantive moral principles. In this paper, I argue that the most prominent non-substantive accounts of moral generalities appealed to by radical particularists – the heuristic account and default reasons accounts – fail in this aim.
Keywords Philosophy   Political Philosophy   Ontology   Ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10677-005-9007-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,586
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Ethics Without Principles.Jonathan Dancy - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Moral Reasons.Jonathan Dancy - 1993 - Blackwell.
Virtue and Reason.John McDowell - 1979 - The Monist 62 (3):331-350.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Moral Particularism and Moral Generalism.Michael Ridge & Sean McKeever - 2016 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Recent Work: Moral Particularism.Jennifer Flynn - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):140-148.
Dewey and Dancy and the Moral Authority of Rules.Tom Spector - 2007 - Contemporary Pragmatism 4 (2):65-75.
Is Every Action Morally Significant?John Haldane - 2011 - Philosophy 86 (3):375-404.
The Principle-Based Method of Practical Ethics.Georg Spielthenner - 2017 - Health Care Analysis 25 (3):275-289.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Varieties of Particularism.Walter Sinnott-Armstrong - 1999 - Metaphilosophy 30 (1&2):1-12.
Moral Particularism.Brad Hooker & Margaret Olivia Little (eds.) - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Against Moral Particularism.Mary Tjiattas - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 1:19-24.
Moral Particularism.Pekka Väyrynen - 2011 - In Christian B. Miller (ed.), The Continuum Companion to Ethics. Continuum. pp. 247-260.
Moral Particularism and the Real World.Brad Hooker - 2007 - In Mark Norris Lance, Matjaž Potrč & Vojko Strahovnik (eds.), Challenging Moral Particularism. Routledge. pp. 12--30.
Moral Principles Are Not Moral Laws.Luke Robinson - 2007 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 2 (3):1-22.
Moral Particularism and Scientific Practice.Brendan Larvor - 2008 - Metaphilosophy 39 (4-5):492-507.
The Many Moral Particularisms.Michael Ridge - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 35 (1):83 - 106.
Ethical Particularism - An Essay on Moral Reasons.Ulrik Kihlbom - 2002 - Almqvist & Wicksell Stockholm International.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
95 ( #99,774 of 2,348,644 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #330,190 of 2,348,644 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes