Qualifying choice: ethical reflection on the scope of prenatal screening

Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 20 (2):195-205 (2017)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11019-016-9725-2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 41,481
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Why Abortion is Immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.
The Right Not to Know: An Autonomy Based Approach.R. Andorno - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):435-439.
Why Abortion Is Immoral.Don Marquis - 1989 - Journal of Philosophy 86 (4):183-202.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A New Era in Prenatal Testing: Are We Prepared? [REVIEW]Dagmar Schmitz - 2013 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 16 (3):357-364.
The Public Must Decide Whether Genetic Screening is Ethical.[author unknown] - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (1):62-62.
Prenatal Screening for Neural Tube Defects: A Choice for All.Lee N. Muecke - 1992 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 36 (1):87-96.
Prenatal Screening in Jewish Law.J. Brown - 1990 - Journal of Medical Ethics 16 (2):75-80.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-09-10

Total views
19 ( #432,659 of 2,248,507 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #85,900 of 2,248,507 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature