Quantum logic and the luders rule

Philosophy of Science 49 (3):422-436 (1982)
Abstract
In a recent paper, Michael Friedman and Hilary Putnam argued that the Luders rule is ad hoc from the point of view of the Copenhagen interpretation but that it receives a natural explanation within realist quantum logic as a probability conditionalization rule. Geoffrey Hellman maintains that quantum logic cannot give a non-circular explanation of the rule, while Jeffrey Bub argues that the rule is not ad hoc within the Copenhagen interpretation. As I see it, all four are wrong. Given that there is to be a projection postulate, there are at least two natural arguments which the Copenhagen advocate can offer on behalf of the Luders rule, contrary to Friedman and Putnam. However, the argument which Bub offers is not a good one. At the same time, contrary to Hellman, quantum logic really does provide an explanation of the Luders rule, and one which is superior to that of the Copenhagen account, since it provides an understanding of why there should be a projection postulate at all
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/289069
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,215
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Weak Values and Consistent Histories in Quantum Theory.Ruth Kastner - 2004 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B 35 (1):57-71.
Measurement and Quantum Silence.Arthur Fine - 1993 - In S. French & H. Kamminga (eds.), Correspondence, Invariance and Heuristics. Kluwer Academic Publishers. pp. 279--294.
Quantum Logic, Realism, and Value Definiteness.Allen Stairs - 1983 - Philosophy of Science 50 (4):578-602.
Minimal Disturbance in Quantum Logic.Sergio Martinez - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:83 - 88.
Quantum Logic, Conditional Probability, and Interference.Jeffrey Bub - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):402-421.
Quantum Logic and the Projection Postulate.Geoffrey Hellman - 1981 - Philosophy of Science 48 (3):469-486.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

18 ( #269,295 of 2,164,580 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #347,948 of 2,164,580 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums