John Searle begins his recent article “Dualism Revisited” by stating his belief that the philosophical problem of consciousness has a scientific solution. He then claims to refute dualism. It is therefore appropriate to examine his arguments against dualism from a scientific perspective
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Dualism: A Parapsychological Perspective.John Beloff - 1989 - In J. Smythies & John Beloff (eds.), The Case for Dualism. Virginia University Press.
Searle on Consciousness: Or How Not to Be a Physicalist.Daniel E. Palmer - 1998 - Ratio 11 (2):159-169.
How Can Searle Avoid Property Dualism? Epistemic-Ontological Inference and Autoepistemic Limitation.Georg Northoff & K. Musholt - 2006 - Philosophical Psychology 19 (5):589-605.
Searle on Consciousness and Dualism.Corbin Collins - 1997 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 5 (1):15-33.
The Give and Take of Biological Naturalism: John Searle and the Case for Dualism.Charles Taliaferro - 2005 - Philosophia Christi 7 (2):447-462.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads716 ( #1,341 of 2,152,217 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,478 of 2,152,217 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.