Humana.Mente 21:19-44 (2012)
Wilfrid Sellars famously argued that we find ourselves simultaneously presented with the scientific and manifest images and that the primary aim of philosophy is to reconcile the competing conceptions of ourselves and our place in the world they offer. I first argue that Sellars’ own attempts at such a reconciliation must be judged a failure. I then go on to point out that Sellars has invited us to join him in idealizing and constructing the manifest and scientific images by conflating a number of importantly distinct contrasts between heterogeneous forms of representation we employ and to argue that we are better off declining this invitation. Recognizing the important differences between these contrasts does not simply obviate the problems of integrating, connecting, and reconciling the various sorts of representations we have of various parts of the world and our own place within it, but it reveals as misguided the notion that there is just a single, fundamental problem of such reconciliation to be solved. It also suggests a potentially far more promising starting point for trying to satisfy the fundamental ambition Sellars attributes to philosophical inquiry itself
|Keywords||Sellars, Wilfrid Manifest and Scientific images|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Identifying and Reconciling Two Images of “Man”.David Hodgson - 2012 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
Of Time and the Two Images.Steven F. Savitt - 2012 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
Sellarsian Synopsis: Integrating the Images.Jay L. Garfield - 2012 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
Ontology and the Completeness of Sellars’s Two Images.Willem deVries - 2012 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21:1-18.
The Unity of the Manifest and Scientific Image by Self-Representation.Keith Lehrer - 2012 - Humana.Mente - Journal of Philosophical Studies 21.
The Manifest Image ≠ the Commonsense Conceptual Framework (in the Philosophy of Wilfrid Sellars).Andrew Chrucky - manuscript
Why Wilfrid Sellars Is Right.William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:291-325.
Prospects for a Stereoscopic Vision of Our Thinking Nature: On Sellars, Brandom, and Millikan.James R. O'Shea - 2012 - Humana.Mente 21.
On Sellars's Two Images of the World.Jay F. Rosenberg - 2009 - In Willem A. DeVries (ed.), Empiricism, Perceptual Knowledge, Normativity, and Realism: Essays on Wilfrid Sellars. Oxford University Press.
The Middle Does Not Hold.William A. Rottschaefer - 2011 - Journal of Philosophical Research 36:361-369.
Added to index2012-05-28
Total downloads88 ( #55,960 of 2,143,881 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #387,257 of 2,143,881 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.