Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):531-533 (2003)
We did not, as Brakel & Shevrin imply, intend to classify either System 1 or System 2 as rational or irrational. Instrumental rationality is assessed at the organismic level, not at the subpersonal level. Thus, neither System 1 nor System 2 are themselves inherently rational or irrational. Also, that genetic fitness and instrumental rationality are not to be equated was a major theme in our target article. We disagree with Bringsjord & Yang's point that the tasks used in the heuristics and biases literature are easy. Bringsjord & Yang too readily conflate the ability to utilize a principle of rational choice with the disposition to do so. Thus, they undervalue tasks in the cognitive science literature that compellingly reveal difficulties with the latter. We agree with Newton & Roberts that models at the algorithmic level of analysis are crucial, but we disagree with their implication that attention to issues of rationality at the intentional level of analysis impedes work at the algorithmic level of analysis.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Subtracting “Ought” From “Is”: Descriptivism Versus Normativism in the Study of Human Thinking.Shira Elqayam & Jonathan Evans - 2011 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 34 (05):251-252.
Similar books and articles
Evidence and Normativity: Reply to Leite.Thomas Kelly - 2007 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 75 (2):465–474.
Methodological Realism and Scientific Rationality.Jarrett Leplin - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (1):31-51.
A Psychological Point of View: Violations of Rational Rules as a Diagnostic of Mental Processes.Daniel Kahneman - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):681-683.
Higher-Order Preferences and the Master Rationality Motive.Keith E. Stanovich - 2008 - Thinking and Reasoning 14 (1):111 – 127.
A Response to the Critique of Rational Choice Theory: Lakatos' and Laudan's Conceptions Applied.Kaisa Herne & Maija Setälä - 2004 - Inquiry 47 (1):67 – 85.
Rational Distinctions and Adaptations.D. E. Over & J. St B. T. Evans - 2000 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23 (5):693-694.
The Problems That Generate the Rationality Debate Are Too Easy, Given What Our Economy Now Demands.Selmer Bringsjord & Yingrui Yang - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (4):528-530.
The Rational Analysis of Mind and Behavior.Nick Chater & Mike Oaksford - 2000 - Synthese 122 (1-2):93-131.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads46 ( #110,279 of 2,152,644 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,611 of 2,152,644 )
How can I increase my downloads?