Zygon 46 (3):536-560 (2011)
AbstractAbstract. A historical perspective allows for a different view on the compatibility of theistic views with a crucial foundation of modern scientific practice: the uniformity of nature, which states that the laws of nature are unbroken through time and space. Uniformity is generally understood to be part of a worldview called “scientific naturalism,” in which there is no room for divine forces or a spiritual realm. This association comes from the Victorian era, but a historical examination of scientists from that period shows that uniformity was an important part of both theistic and naturalistic worldviews. Victorian efforts to maintain the viability of miracles and divine action within a universe ruled by natural laws receives special attention. The methodological practices of theistic and naturalistic scientists in the nineteenth century were effectively indistinguishable despite each group's argument that uniformity was closely dependent on their worldview. This similarity is used to reexamine both the reasons for the decline of the role of religion within the scientific community and claims made by the intelligent design movement about the relationship of science and religion
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
A Preliminary Discourse on the Study of Natural Philosophy.John F. W. Herschel - 1830 - University of Chicago Press.
Revisiting Discovery and Justification: Historical and Philosophical Perspectives on the Context Distinction.Jutta Schickore & Friedrich Steinle (eds.) - 2006 - Springer.
Darwin's Metaphor: Nature's Place in Victorian Culture.Robert M. Young - 1987 - Journal of the History of Biology 20 (1):131-132.
Reconciling Science and Religion: THE DEBATE IN EARLY-TWENTIETH-CENTURY BRITAIN.Peter J. Bowler - 2001 - University of Chicago Press.
Citations of this work
Finding Revelation in Anthropology: Alexander Winchell, William Robertson Smith and the Heretical Imperative.David N. Livingstone - 2015 - British Journal for the History of Science 48 (3):435-454.
Actions and Agents: Natural and Supernatural Reconsidered.Joseph A. Bracken - 2013 - Zygon 48 (4):1001-1013.
Scientific Uniformity or “Natural” Divine Action: Shifting the Boundaries of Law in the Nineteenth Century.Nathan K. C. Bossoh - 2021 - Zygon 56 (1):234-253.
Similar books and articles
God, Design, and Naturalism: Implications of Methodological Naturalism in Science for Science–Religion Relation.Piotr Bylica & Dariusz Sagan - 2008 - Pensamiento 64 (242):621-38.
The Unity of Science.Martin Carrier - 1990 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 4 (1):17-31.
Charles Lyell and the Uniformity Principle.Giovanni Camardi - 1999 - Biology and Philosophy 14 (4):537-560.
Principles, Laws, Theories and the Metaphysics of Science.Craig Dilworth - 1994 - Synthese 101 (2):223 - 247.
Naturalism, Naturalism by Other Means, and ÂAlternatives to Naturalism.Andrew Porter - 2003 - Theology and Science 1 (2):221-237.
Questioning Scientific Faith in the Late Nineteenth Century.Frederick Gregory - 2008 - Zygon 43 (3):651-664.
Newtonian Science, Miracles, and the Laws of Nature.Peter Harrison - 1995 - Journal of the History of Ideas 56 (4):531 - 553.
The Philosophy of Scientific Practice in Naturalist Thought: Its Approaches and Problems. [REVIEW]Xiaofei Tian & Tong Wu - 2009 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 4 (4):589-603.