Authors
Titus Stahl
University of Groningen
Abstract
This working paper examines the notion of "immanent critique", a central methodological commitment of critical theories of society. In the first part, I distinguish immanent critique - a critique which reconstructs norms immanent in a social practice which point beyond the normative self-understanding of its members - from both external and internal critique and examine three questions that a theory of immanent critique has to answer (a social ontological, an epistemological and a justificatory question). After surveying some of the classic accounts of immanent critique in part two, I then distinguish two varieties of immanent critique, a hermeneutic and a practice-theoretic approach. Drawing on theories in recent analytic philosophy, I finally argue for a practice-theoretic approach to immanent critique that locates the relevant norms in a practice constituted by mutual recognition.
Keywords Immanent Critique  Internal Critique  Social Practices  Critical Theory
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Conditions of Immanent Critique.Alexei Procyshyn - 2022 - Critical Horizons 23 (1):22-43.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Habermas and the Project of Immanent Critique.Titus Stahl - 2013 - Constellations 20 (4):533-552.
Anerkennung, Subjektivität und Gesellschaftskritik.Titus Stahl - 2014 - Deutsche Zeitschrift für Philosophie 62 (2):239-259.
Critical Science Studies as Argumentation Theory: Who’s Afraid of SSK?William Rehg - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (1):33-48.
La Critique Hégélienne.Jacques D'Hondt - 1999 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 189 (2):169-180.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-10-22

Total views
1,346 ( #4,010 of 2,505,989 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
99 ( #7,461 of 2,505,989 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes